NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing 1 to 15 of 33 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Koehler, W. F. – Research in Higher Education, 1986
A salary-growth model is described that includes the nature of the salary dependence on experience for various levels of performance of faculty members in a subset having the same level of education and the same marketability of their specialities. (Author/MLW)
Descriptors: College Faculty, Compensation (Remuneration), Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Crooks, Terence J.; Kane, Michael T. – Research in Higher Education, 1981
The consistency of ratings between different sections of a course taught in a given semester by the same instructor is examined, and the performance of global and attribute-type instructor rating items are compared. Five samples of physics instructors were rated by their students. (Author/MLW)
Descriptors: College Instruction, Courses, Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Batista, Enrique E. – Research in Higher Education, 1976
Little agreement as to criteria for evaluating college teaching was found in a literature review. A list of 10 activities and faculty behaviors that can be more reliably and validly evaluated by fellow colleagues than by students or administrators is presented. Recommendations for upgrading colleague evaluation of teaching are made. (JT)
Descriptors: College Faculty, College Instruction, Evaluation Criteria, Faculty Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Jauch, Lawrence R. – Research in Higher Education, 1976
Research involving 23 hard science disciplines at a midwestern university indicates that research and teaching are complementary but that time allocation tradeoffs are necessary between the two functions. Administratively, evaluations tend to influence the direction faculty choose to follow. (Author/LBH)
Descriptors: College Faculty, Evaluation Criteria, Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Roskens, Ronald W. – Research in Higher Education, 1983
The Biglan model of classification of academic subject areas is outlined, and its practical implications and uses by administrators for faculty evaluation are discussed. The reasons for applying subject-area standards in faculty productivity studies are examined. (MSE)
Descriptors: Classification, College Faculty, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Saaty, Thomas L.; Ramanujam, Vasudevan – Research in Higher Education, 1983
A faculty evaluation system that classified performance factors within a hierarchy and weights each, producing a final composite set for each faculty member, is explained and illustrated. The process is recommended for more objective and consistent decision-making about faculty tenure. (MSE)
Descriptors: College Faculty, Decision Making, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Wenger, Robert B.; Girard, Dennis M. – Research in Higher Education, 2000
Presents a merit pay allocation model based on the principle of awarding comparable percentage salary increases to college/university faculty members with similar merit ratings. The model enables users to calculate merit pay amounts for individual faculty members in a systematic and efficient manner and can incorporate various policy directives…
Descriptors: College Faculty, Compensation (Remuneration), Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Ory, John C.; Braskamp, Larry A. – Research in Higher Education, 1981
Faculty perceptions of student evaluative information collected by three methods (objective questionnaire items, open-ended questions, and group interviews) were investigated. Faculty regarded the evaluative information to be more credible, useful, and accurate for their own self-improvement than for promotion purposes. (Author/MLW)
Descriptors: Educational Quality, Evaluation Methods, Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
McLaughlin, Gerald W.; And Others – Research in Higher Education, 1981
A study on a survey of department heads in 25 major universities that examines what department heads perceive to be the component parts in making assignments to faculty is discussed. The importance of evaluating faculty based on effort required rather than on time devoted to given tasks is stressed. (Author/MLW)
Descriptors: College Faculty, Content Analysis, Faculty Evaluation, Faculty Workload
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Francis, John B. – Research in Higher Education, 1976
Instructors whose teaching was evaluated by students rated how applicable the evaluation items were to their classes. Results show that while weighting composite evaluation scores by means of faculty applicability judgments does not affect those overall scores, the distributions of certain items may be altered. (Editor/JT)
Descriptors: College Faculty, Course Evaluation, Educational Research, Evaluation Criteria
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Boice, Robert – Research in Higher Education, 1984
Clinically based direct interventions with colleagues were used to demonstrate ways of surmounting four constraints in faculty development research: the problem of engaging the least needy faculty, faculty who refuse feedback based on student ratings, improvement of teaching skills while making progress as writers, and teaching scholarly…
Descriptors: College Faculty, Faculty Development, Faculty Evaluation, Faculty Promotion
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Jauch, Lawrence R.; Gentry, James W. – Research in Higher Education, 1976
Three areas (business, psychology, and sociology/anthropology) at Kansas State University were studied. Significant differences were found in the orientations and the criteria that are being used and that should be used (according to the respondents) for performance evaluation. All agreed that teaching should be an important evaluative criterion.…
Descriptors: Behavioral Sciences, Case Studies, Comparative Analysis, Departments
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
McCallum, L. W. – Research in Higher Education, 1984
A meta-analysis of studies examining the criterion validity of student course evaluation data is discussed. Results indicate that the overall size of effect is not only highly significant, but also very meaningful when analyzed in relation to enhancing the likelihood of making more accurate tenure decisions. (Author/MLW)
Descriptors: Course Evaluation, Data Analysis, Decision Making, Faculty Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Haladyna, Thomas; Hess, Robert K. – Research in Higher Education, 1994
A Rasch model was used to detect and correct bias in Likert rating scales used to assess student perceptions of college teaching, using a database of ratings. Statistical corrections were significant, supporting the model's potential utility. Recommendations are made for a theoretical rationale and further research on the model. (Author/MSE)
Descriptors: College Faculty, College Instruction, Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Follman, John – Research in Higher Education, 1975
Reviews the theoretical and empirical literature on the influence of student-rater personality characteristics on the ratings they give their instructors. Included are conclusions, recommendations for further research, and a list of 45 references. (JT)
Descriptors: Behavior Rating Scales, College Faculty, College Students, Faculty Evaluation
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3