Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
Faculty Evaluation | 5 |
Faculty Promotion | 5 |
Higher Education | 5 |
Program Development | 5 |
Tenure | 3 |
Clinical Teaching (Health… | 2 |
College Faculty | 2 |
Evaluation Criteria | 2 |
Faculty Development | 2 |
Professional Education | 2 |
Scholarship | 2 |
More ▼ |
Author
Joosten, Yvonne A. | 1 |
Jordan, Catherine M. | 1 |
Jungnickel, Paul W. | 1 |
Leugers, Rebecca C. | 1 |
Martin, Robert E. | 1 |
Rothman, Arthur I. | 1 |
Shields, Sharon L. | 1 |
Stevenson, Dwight W. | 1 |
Whitmore, Jon, Ed. | 1 |
Wong, Kristine A. | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Reports - Descriptive | 3 |
Speeches/Meeting Papers | 2 |
Guides - Non-Classroom | 1 |
Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 1 |
Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Administrators | 1 |
Practitioners | 1 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Jordan, Catherine M.; Wong, Kristine A.; Jungnickel, Paul W.; Joosten, Yvonne A.; Leugers, Rebecca C.; Shields, Sharon L. – Metropolitan Universities, 2009
The Peer Review Workgroup of the Community-Engaged Scholarship for Health Collaborative developed a novel set of quality community-engaged scholarship characteristics and a resource package aimed at two primary audiences: faculty seeking promotion or tenure based on community-engaged scholarship; and review, promotion, and tenure committee members…
Descriptors: Tenure, Faculty Development, College Faculty, Guides

Martin, Robert E.; And Others – American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 1983
The development of evaluation and development programs for clinical faculty was based on information and criteria gathered from 22 other doctoral pharmacy programs. Specific guidelines for promotion and/or continuing appointment and an outline of the faculty training program in clinical research, evaluative research, and improved teaching are…
Descriptors: Academic Rank (Professional), Clinical Teaching (Health Professions), Doctoral Programs, Faculty Development

Rothman, Arthur I.; And Others – Academic Medicine, 1989
The policy and procedures for evaluation of clinical faculty at the University of Toronto's Faculty of Medicine are outlined, focusing on the institution's response to faculty perceptions of discrepancies between policy and practice especially in the area of promotion on the basis of teaching excellence. (MSE)
Descriptors: Clinical Teaching (Health Professions), Faculty Evaluation, Faculty Promotion, Higher Education
Whitmore, Jon, Ed. – 1988
Based on a workshop for theatre department chairs, guidance on administrative and departmental responsibilities are provided in the following chapters: (1) "Chairs and Deans: Working Together" (J. Robert Wills); (2) "Faculty Evaluation" (Patti P. Gillespie); (3) "Evaluation for Promotion and Tenure" (James M. Symons); (4) "Production Program…
Descriptors: Administrator Responsibility, Budgeting, College Curriculum, College Faculty
Stevenson, Dwight W. – 1984
As technical communication is a young academic discipline, evaluating technical communication faculty for promotion, tenure, and merit purposes requires special awareness and care. To determine reasonable expectations of faculty achievement, a study documented the range, types, and frequency of activities of 12 professors and 12 associate…
Descriptors: Educational Research, Evaluation Criteria, Faculty Evaluation, Faculty Promotion