NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 4 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Marsh, Herbert W.; Hattie, John – Journal of Higher Education, 2002
Following from the Hattie and Marsh (1996) meta-analysis, examined the correlation between research productivity and teaching effectiveness at an Australian university. Found further evidence of no correlation, supporting the hypothesis that teaching and research excellence are independent constructs. (EV)
Descriptors: College Faculty, Correlation, Faculty Publishing, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Hattie, John; And Others – Australian Journal of Education, 1994
It is proposed that, in evaluation of higher education, the individual faculty member is a more appropriate unit of analysis than institution or department. A study of faculty (n=2,048) productivity in publishing scholarly journal articles provides evidence supporting this view. (Author/MSE)
Descriptors: Citation Analysis, College Faculty, Educational Quality, Evaluation Criteria
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Hattie, John; Marsh, H. W. – Review of Educational Research, 1996
A review of various models of the relationship between research and teaching in universities is presented, and the evidence necessary to assess each model is outlined. A meta analysis of 59 studies demonstrates that the relationship is zero. Suggestions are provided for future directions. (Author/SLD)
Descriptors: College Faculty, Faculty Publishing, Higher Education, Instruction
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Print, Murray; Hattie, John – Higher Education, 1997
A study tested a procedure to identify and weigh various indicators of college faculty research productivity, as one measure of program quality. Eighty-six faculty in 34 Australian schools of education were surveyed. Highly valued indicators of research productivity included refereed journal articles, peer reviewed books, and major competitive…
Descriptors: College Faculty, Competition, Educational Quality, Evaluation Criteria