Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 2 |
Reports - Descriptive | 2 |
Legal/Legislative/Regulatory… | 1 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Elementary Secondary Education | 2 |
Higher Education | 1 |
Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
USSR | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
No Child Left Behind Act 2001 | 2 |
Elementary and Secondary… | 1 |
Race to the Top | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
Trends in International… | 4 |
National Assessment of… | 2 |
Program for International… | 2 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Bakker, Steven – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 2012
A particular trait of the educational system under socialist reign was accountability at the input side--appropriate facilities, centrally decided curriculum, approved text-books, and uniformly trained teachers--but no control on the output. It was simply assumed that it met the agreed standards, which was, in turn, proven by the statistics…
Descriptors: Accountability, Social Problems, Ethics, Foreign Students
Katzman, John – Education Digest: Essential Readings Condensed for Quick Review, 2012
It's no surprise that, 28 years after the publication of "A Nation at Risk," school-reform efforts have generated so little effect. The nation's schools have proven, over the past century, adept at resisting change. Recent attempts to inject accountability and innovation have brought an important opportunity. No Child Left Behind helped…
Descriptors: State Standards, Educational Innovation, Educational Change, Public Education
McCluskey, Neal – Cato Institute, 2010
The argument for national curriculum standards sounds simple: set high standards, make all schools meet them, and watch American students achieve at high levels. It is straightforward and compelling, and it is driving a sea change in American education policy. Unfortunately, setting high standards and getting American students to hit them is…
Descriptors: Evidence, National Curriculum, Economic Progress, Free Enterprise System
Congress of the U.S., Washington, DC. House Committee on Education and the Workforce. – 1998
H.R. 2846, a bill to prohibit spending Federal education funds on national testing without explicit and specific legislation was referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce of the U.S. House of Representatives. The Committee, having reviewed the bill, reports favorably on it in this document, proposes some amendments, and recommends…
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Educational Finance, Educational Policy, Elementary Secondary Education