Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 10 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 31 |
Descriptor
Federal Legislation | 93 |
Guidelines | 93 |
Program Implementation | 93 |
Educational Legislation | 50 |
Program Development | 30 |
Vocational Education | 25 |
Disabilities | 22 |
Agency Cooperation | 21 |
Postsecondary Education | 19 |
Statewide Planning | 19 |
Delivery Systems | 18 |
More ▼ |
Source
Author
Kogan, Deborah | 7 |
Koller, Vinz | 6 |
Kozumplik, Richalene | 6 |
Lawrence, Mary Ann | 6 |
Alamprese, Judy | 1 |
Allington, Richard L. | 1 |
Bailey, Adrienne | 1 |
Baker, Alberta | 1 |
Bhaerman, Robert D. | 1 |
Bowe, Frank | 1 |
Brown, Rebecca | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
Practitioners | 21 |
Teachers | 13 |
Administrators | 7 |
Policymakers | 6 |
Students | 6 |
Community | 4 |
Parents | 2 |
Support Staff | 1 |
Location
Pennsylvania | 4 |
Texas | 4 |
California | 3 |
Canada | 3 |
United States | 3 |
Utah | 3 |
Vermont | 3 |
Florida | 2 |
Minnesota | 2 |
New York | 2 |
Ohio | 2 |
More ▼ |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Hollingshead, Aleksandra; Lowrey, K. Alisa; Howery, Kathy – Educational Policy, 2022
Universal Design for Learning (UDL) is a scientifically validated framework that has been included in policy like the Every Student Succeeds Act of 2015 and the Higher Education Opportunity Act of 2008. However, studies have pointed out the variability in definitions and implementation surrounding UDL. In order to clarify this conversation,…
Descriptors: Access to Education, Specialists, Policy Analysis, Educational Legislation
Thurlow, Martha L.; Test, David W.; Rogers, Christopher M.; Klare, Matthew; Lazarus, Sheryl S. – National Center on Educational Outcomes, 2019
The purpose of this report is to summarize the status of state-defined alternate diplomas in the 50 U.S. states three years after the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESSA) indicated that states could develop these diplomas and use them in accountability calculations. To count this diploma in a graduation measure for accountability, several…
Descriptors: High School Equivalency Programs, Students with Disabilities, Elementary Secondary Education, Educational Legislation
Council of Chief State School Officers, 2017
As states move forward on the development of their Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) plans, incorporating the best of the feedback received from stakeholders along the way is a critical step in the process. All states are required by law to meaningfully engage with a wide array of stakeholders as they develop their plans to ensure that new…
Descriptors: Stakeholders, Feedback (Response), Statewide Planning, Educational Planning
Hale, Sylvie; Dunn, Lenay; Filby, Nikola; Rice, John; Van Houten, Lori – WestEd, 2017
One of the broad intents of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) as amended by the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) is to encourage evidence-based decision-making as a way of doing business. Nonregulatory guidance issued in September 2016 by the U.S. Department of Education (ED) clarifies and expands on both the nature of…
Descriptors: Evidence Based Practice, Educational Improvement, Educational Legislation, Federal Legislation
Savitz, Rachelle Sarah; Allington, Richard L.; Wilkins, Julia – Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 2018
This article reports an analysis of RTI information provided on the websites of all 50 State Departments of Education, based on the assumption that school districts rely on this information when developing their RTI programs. Our analysis revealed little consistency in (a) the methods used to identify students to be served in RTI interventions,…
Descriptors: Response to Intervention, State Departments of Education, School Districts, Educational Policy
Council of Chief State School Officers, 2017
Stakeholder engagement is a critical component of the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA). Under the law, states are required to engage specific stakeholders as they develop the consolidated state plan to submit to the U.S. Department of Education. But states should not only engage with their stakeholders because it's required under the law --…
Descriptors: Stakeholders, Feedback (Response), Statewide Planning, Educational Planning
Council of Chief State School Officers, 2017
This guide is intended to help states assess the engagement strategies used during the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) development stage, identify the ones to sustain or refine, and develop a long-term plan that will continue to create opportunities for stakeholders to be heard on this and other education issues. The guidance in this document…
Descriptors: Stakeholders, Feedback (Response), Statewide Planning, Educational Planning
Council of Chief State School Officers, 2016
The Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) offers states an incredible opportunity to develop or refine a strategic vision for education to chart their own path forward. The new federal law allows education leaders and stakeholders to rethink their own accountability, funding, school improvement and grant-making systems by gathering input from the…
Descriptors: Stakeholders, Feedback (Response), Statewide Planning, Educational Planning
Council of Chief State School Officers, 2016
The Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) has drastically changed the federal education landscape for the first time in more than a decade. State education agencies (SEAs) have been granted additional flexibility under the new law but first must establish their state strategic vision and evaluate how the new law will affect their accountability,…
Descriptors: Stakeholders, Feedback (Response), Statewide Planning, Educational Planning
Council of Chief State School Officers, 2016
The Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) asks states to engage with a wide array of stakeholders throughout the development of their plans, encouraging outreach that goes well beyond the organizational leaders with whom the state education agency is most familiar. The purpose behind this outreach is to ensure that the state's ESSA plan truly…
Descriptors: Stakeholders, Feedback (Response), Statewide Planning, Educational Planning
McNeil, Michele – Education Week, 2013
Even though 34 states and the District of Columbia have No Child Left Behind Act waivers in hand, many of them are still negotiating with the U.S. Department of Education over their teacher evaluation systems--a crucial component if they want to keep their newfound flexibility. More than six months after waiver recipients turned in their…
Descriptors: Teacher Evaluation, Federal Legislation, Federal Programs, Federal Regulation
McBride, Shirley R. – Journal of the International Association of Special Education, 2013
This article reviews the historical context in which Canadian legislation and policy for children with special needs has evolved. The potential for the rights of students with special needs in light of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms is outlined. The role of the Federal and Provincial governments in legislation and policy vis-à-vis…
Descriptors: Special Education, Educational Legislation, Educational Policy, Foreign Countries
Miller, Tiffany D. – Center for American Progress, 2013
The Center for American Progress previously examined the extent to which states applying for first-round Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) flexibility waivers in 2012 planned to expand in-school learning time to turn around low-performing schools. This report provides an up-to-date review of states' ESEA flexibility plans and assesses…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, Educational Legislation, Elementary Secondary Education, Compliance (Legal)
Hedeen, Timothy; Peter, Marshall; Moses, Philip; Engiles, Anita – Center for Appropriate Dispute Resolution in Special Education (CADRE), 2013
Over 6.5 million youth and their families are eligible for early intervention or special education services (Data Accountability Center, 2011) under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 2004 (IDEA). The principal mechanism by which goals, objectives, services, and placements are determined for Part B of the IDEA are Individualized…
Descriptors: Individualized Education Programs, Individualized Family Service Plans, Early Intervention, Special Education
Evans, Meg – Innosight Institute, 2012
The top priority for the U.S. Department of Education's new Race to the Top-District (RTT-D) competition is to create personalized-learning environments to bolster student achievement: "Absolute Priority 1: Personalized Learning Environments. To meet this priority, an applicant must coherently and comprehensively address how it will build on…
Descriptors: Guides, Federal Legislation, Federal Programs, Competition