Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 17 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 117 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 367 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 900 |
Descriptor
| Federal Legislation | 1687 |
| Program Implementation | 1687 |
| Educational Legislation | 835 |
| Elementary Secondary Education | 557 |
| Federal Programs | 392 |
| Program Effectiveness | 361 |
| Disabilities | 337 |
| Accountability | 324 |
| Educational Policy | 308 |
| Federal Aid | 308 |
| School Districts | 301 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Policymakers | 150 |
| Practitioners | 129 |
| Administrators | 79 |
| Teachers | 32 |
| Parents | 12 |
| Community | 10 |
| Researchers | 8 |
| Students | 7 |
| Support Staff | 1 |
Location
| California | 58 |
| Georgia | 57 |
| New York | 56 |
| Illinois | 52 |
| Texas | 48 |
| North Carolina | 47 |
| Pennsylvania | 46 |
| Florida | 45 |
| Ohio | 45 |
| Tennessee | 42 |
| Delaware | 41 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedBillig, Shelley H – Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 1998
Summarizes results of a 1997 survey of state and local Title I educators who are implementing the 1994 Title I reauthorization. Data indicate that the five major themes have been implemented. Results are compared to the previous year's survey and recommendations are offered for future research areas and future funding allocations. (MMU)
Descriptors: Educational Change, Educational Policy, Elementary Secondary Education, Federal Legislation
Peer reviewedHayes, Elisabeth – New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 1999
Reviews federal and state legislation affecting adult literacy education. Describes policy interpretation and implementation issues that affect the delivery of education. (SK)
Descriptors: Adult Literacy, Educational Finance, Federal Legislation, Literacy Education
Burdette, Paula – Project Forum, 2007
Based on the importance of Response to Intervention (RTI) and Early Intervening Services (EIS) for state education agencies (SEAs), local educational agencies (LEAs), the U.S. Department of Education's Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP) and Office of Elementary and Secondary Education (OESE) and many other stakeholder groups, Project…
Descriptors: Early Intervention, Elementary Secondary Education, Learning Disabilities, Special Education
Arter, Patricia S. – TEACHING Exceptional Children, 2007
No Child Left Behind (NCLB) mandates that "all" students, not just well-behaved and academically motivated students, make academic progress. Unfortunately, about 10% of students with chronic behavior problems make this goal difficult for themselves and others (Sprague & Walker, 2000; Sugai, 2000). The Positive Alternative Learning…
Descriptors: Behavior Problems, Intervention, Federal Legislation, Academic Achievement
Scott, Caitlin; McMurrer, Jennifer; McIntosh, Shelby – Center on Education Policy, 2012
Two schools in Idaho received ARRA SIG (American Recovery and Reinvestment Act School Improvement Grants) funds to enable them to implement improvement efforts. This paper describes the outcomes of these two ARRA SIG recipient schools: (1) Jefferson Middle School; and (2) Lakeside Elementary School. The experiences of this non-recipient school is…
Descriptors: Case Studies, Program Effectiveness, Program Evaluation, Elementary Schools
Scott, Caitlin; Dibner, Kenne – Center on Education Policy, 2012
Two schools in Michigan received ARRA SIG (American Recovery and Reinvestment Act School Improvement Grants) funds to enable them to implement their improvement efforts. This paper describes the outcomes of these two ARRA SIG recipient schools: (1) Phoenix Elementary-Middle School; and (2) Arthur Hill High School. The experiences of these…
Descriptors: Grants, High Schools, Elementary Schools, Case Studies
Evaluation of the Comprehensive School Reform Program Implementation and Outcomes. Third-Year Report
Orland, Martin; Connolly, Brooke; Fong, Tony; Sosenko, Lauren Davis; Tushnet, Naida C.; Yin, Robert K.; Burt, Janeula M.; Warner, Emily – US Department of Education, 2008
The Comprehensive School Reform (CSR) Program was established as a demonstration program in 1998 and authorized as a full program in 2002 as part of the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB). It is one approach to help low-performing K-12 public schools meet state performance standards. CSR emphasizes two major concepts: mandating that school reform…
Descriptors: School Restructuring, Elementary Secondary Education, Federal Legislation, Academic Achievement
Gagnon, Joseph C.; Rockwell, Sarah B.; Scott, Terrance M. – Focus on Exceptional Children, 2008
One approach to student behavior that may be particularly useful in exclusionary settings is school-wide positive behavior supports (PBS). Increasingly, evidence shows that PBS is an effective approach to student behavior in regular public schools (Sugai & Horner, 2005). While the data on behavioral systems in exclusionary schools are…
Descriptors: Public Schools, Behavior Problems, Student Behavior, Behavior Modification
Giles, David, Ed. – Education Law Center, 2008
This manual is designed to help advocates, including parents, obtain special education for children with disabilities residing in New Jersey. It explains the requirements of the federal statute governing special education--the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA)--and the federal regulations implementing IDEA, as well as the state…
Descriptors: Nontraditional Education, Civil Rights, Laws, Disabilities
Munoz, Cecilia – 1990
The intent of the Immigration Reform and Control Act (IRCA) of 1986 to eliminate the large exploitable subclass of undocumented immigrants living within the borders of the United States cannot be achieved through the methods chosen for its implementation. IRCA was designed to legalize the status of undocumented immigrants and to prevent more…
Descriptors: Citizenship, Employer Employee Relationship, Federal Legislation, Federal Programs
Kennedy, Mary M. – 1985
Evaluations of Chapter 1 programs usually center on one of three questions: (1) Does the program constitute an appropriate Federal investment? (2) Does the program have the potential to benefit students? and (3) Is the program feasible enough to implement? Often, evaluators and legislators disagree over which of these questions is most important.…
Descriptors: Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Needs, Federal Legislation, Federal Programs
Congress of the U.S., Washington, DC. Senate Special Committee on Aging. – 1988
The Domestic Volunteer Service Act of 1973 authorizes ACTION, an independent agency, to administer six volunteer programs including the three components under Title II, the Older Americans Volunteer Program (OAVP). The programs under OAVP--the Foster Grandparent Program (FGP), the Retired Senior Volunteer Program (RSVP), and the Senior Companion…
Descriptors: Community Programs, Federal Legislation, Federal Programs, Grandparents
Hamilton, Bette Everett; Bush, Barbara A. – Journal of Children in Contemporary Society, 1983
Illustrates the potential for inconsistent interpretations of the statutory regulations of the Education Consolidation Improvement Act by describing the different approaches Connecticut, Arizona, New York, and Mississippi are taking in implementing the law. (CMG)
Descriptors: Compensatory Education, Educationally Disadvantaged, Elementary Secondary Education, Federal Legislation
US Department of Education, 2004
The No Child Left Behind Act required states and districts to begin offering supplemental educational services in the 2002-03 school year to students from low-income families attending Title I schools that had been identified for improvement for two years or more. This brief is based on a larger study that examined the first year of implementation…
Descriptors: Program Implementation, Compensatory Education, Educational Legislation, Federal Legislation
Peer reviewedLe Tendre, Mary Jean – Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 1996
Provides detailed examples of the components of Title I as recently revised and suggests alternative ways that the program's new flexibility can be used to enhance school reform. Revised Title I audit procedures are also designed to promote improved program performance and increased understanding of the law. (SLD)
Descriptors: Compensatory Education, Educational Change, Elementary Secondary Education, Federal Legislation

Direct link
