Descriptor
| Compensatory Education | 85 |
| Evaluation Methods | 85 |
| Federal Programs | 85 |
| Program Evaluation | 67 |
| Elementary Secondary Education | 40 |
| Disadvantaged Youth | 29 |
| Program Effectiveness | 20 |
| School Districts | 19 |
| Academic Achievement | 16 |
| Educationally Disadvantaged | 13 |
| Educational Assessment | 12 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Educational Evaluation and… | 4 |
| Comparative Education Review | 1 |
| Evaluation Review | 1 |
| Evaluation and Program… | 1 |
| Journal of Experimental… | 1 |
| Journal of Instructional… | 1 |
| Phi Delta Kappan | 1 |
| Urban Rev | 1 |
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Location
| Connecticut | 5 |
| Pennsylvania (Philadelphia) | 5 |
| Ohio | 3 |
| Ohio (Cincinnati) | 3 |
| Ohio (Cleveland) | 2 |
| Pennsylvania | 2 |
| Arizona | 1 |
| Arkansas | 1 |
| District of Columbia | 1 |
| Hawaii | 1 |
| Michigan | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Metropolitan Readiness Tests | 1 |
| National Assessment of… | 1 |
| Wechsler Preschool and… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Download full textKilbane-Flash, Marian T. – 1976
The emergence of a sequence in evaluation approaches at the local level during the decade of Title I is discussed. These recurring patterns related to objectives, evaluation designs and data collection modes reflect impact of both external factors (e.g., changes in funding guidelines) and internal factors (e.g., changes in priority needs).…
Descriptors: Compensatory Education, Educational Change, Evaluation Methods, Federal Programs
Anderson, Judith I.; Stonehill, Robert M. – 1982
The evaluation strategies and results for Title I programs were compared and contrasted. Two systems of evaluation to examine the nature and effectiveness of Elementary Secondary Education Act (ESEA) Title I programs nationwide were implemented. The first involved sponsoring national studies, including the Study of the Sustaining Effects of…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Compensatory Education, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods
Evans, John W. – 1977
This statement describes the Elementary and Secondary Education Act Title I's evaluation effort. Evaluation activities are mandated by Section 151 of the Act and are varied and complex. The evaluation efforts focus as a first priority on improving local and state evaluation activities. The efforts involve the development of evaluation models, the…
Descriptors: Compensatory Education, Conceptual Schemes, Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Needs
Hill-Scott, Karen; Grigsby, J. Eugene – Phi Delta Kappan, 1979
Looks at past evaluation of compensatory education, suggests new approaches to evaluation, and makes recommendations about program implementation. (IRT)
Descriptors: Compensatory Education, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods, Federal Programs
Chalupsky, Albert B.; and others – Urban Rev, 1969
Descriptors: Action Research, Compensatory Education, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods
1969
Evaluation of Head Start programs is approached through identification of interactions with families and communities to learn what effects the Head Start experiences have had on the children involved. As a result of earlier studies, measures were developed for social-emotional and family factors, as well as program characteristics. In 1966-67, the…
Descriptors: Compensatory Education, Evaluation Methods, Federal Programs, Measurement Instruments
General Electric Co., Washington, DC. TEMPO. – 1971
This paper reviews the findings of TEMPO's 1967 and subsequent evaluation studies and offers some conclusions and recommendations aimed at strengthening Title I compensatory education programs. An overview of Title I and a description of the TEMPO study and its methodology are provided. It is stated that, with the measurement methods used, no…
Descriptors: Compensatory Education, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Needs
KENYON, RAYMOND G. – 1966
THIS REPORT CONTAINS THE RESULTS OF A QUESTIONNAIRE SURVEY OF TITLE I PROJECT DEVELOPMENT. A QUESTIONNAIRE REQUESTED THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION--NAME OF PERSON RESPONSIBLE FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PROJECT, PROJECT DESCRIPTION, TYPE OF PROJECT (CURRICULUM, MULTIMEDIA, STUDENT-PERSONNEL SERVICES, ADMINISTRATIVE, OR OTHER), NUMBER OF PUPILS SERVED,…
Descriptors: Compensatory Education, Disadvantaged Youth, Evaluation Methods, Federal Programs
McLaughlin, Donald H. – 1977
This report focuses on the results of approximately twenty central studies of compensatory education completed before 1977 and presents the major results of those studies as they relate to important policy questions for Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act. The results are presented first as they relate to the major tasks of Title…
Descriptors: Compensatory Education, Educational Policy, Evaluation, Evaluation Methods
Fleming, Margaret – 1976
It is proposed that the mandate for evaluation of Elementary Secondary Education Act (ESEA) Title I projects has served to establish models for evaluation design, implementation, and utilization of findings in a large urban school system. Contrary to the experience with evaluation of the "national" Title I program, local efforts were…
Descriptors: Compensatory Education, Educational Policy, Evaluation Methods, Federal Programs
Sorenson, Philip H. – 1973
Congress authorized Follow Through in 1967 under the Economic Opportunity Act to provide developmental and educational services for poor children in primary grades who had experienced Head Start or equivalent pre-school. A large scale service program was envisioned originally. Appropriations were not sufficient, however, so Follow Through was…
Descriptors: Compensatory Education, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods, Federal Programs
Harvey, James J.; Hill, Paul T. – 1977
This National Institute of Education (NIE) study of compensatory education, and evaluation of Elementary and Secondary Education Act Title I is a response to congressional evaluation needs. The report traces the origin of Title I and the congressional interest in its evaluation. Prior efforts to assess the effectiveness of Title I, congressional…
Descriptors: Compensatory Education, Disadvantaged Youth, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods
HARSH, J. RICHARD – 1967
APPRAISALS OF ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY ACT PROGRAMS SHOULD BE MADE IN TERMS OF (1) A PROGRAM'S STATED PURPOSES, (2) A BEHAVIORIAL DEFINITION OF PROGRAM OBJECTIVES, (3) THE SITUATIONS AND EXPERIENCES THROUGH WHICH THE OBJECTIVES ARE TO BE ACHIEVED, (4) DATA COLLECTED BY APPROPRIATE INSTRUMENTS TO MEASURE THE ACHIEVEMENT OF OBJECTIVES, AND (5) DATA…
Descriptors: Compensatory Education, Data Analysis, Data Collection, Disadvantaged Youth
JACOBS, JAMES N.; AND OTHERS – 1967
THE EFFECT WHICH THE FIRST YEAR OF VARIOUS ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION ACT (ESEA) TITLE I COMPENSATORY EDUCATION PROJECTS HAS HAD ON A DISADVANTAGED POPULATION IN CINCINNATI IS REPORTED IN THIS EVALUATION. THE EVALUATORS HYPOTHESIZED THAT THE MOST DRAMATIC RESULTS WOULD OCCUR IN SCHOOLS WHICH RECEIVED THE MOST INTENSIVE TREATMENT. IN THE…
Descriptors: Ancillary School Services, Annual Reports, Compensatory Education, Disadvantaged Youth
Nairus, John P. – 1976
The original requirement for evaluation in Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 was unprecedented. However, the wording and intent of the requirement was purposely left vague because of the conflict between the schoolman's concern over federal interference and Congress' demands for feedback that could lead to efficient…
Descriptors: Compensatory Education, Disadvantaged Youth, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation
