Descriptor
Compensatory Education | 97 |
Federal Programs | 97 |
Program Administration | 97 |
Program Evaluation | 59 |
Elementary Secondary Education | 35 |
Disadvantaged Youth | 34 |
School Districts | 29 |
State Programs | 22 |
Program Development | 21 |
Educationally Disadvantaged | 20 |
Federal Aid | 19 |
More ▼ |
Author
BARNES, EDWARD G. | 2 |
Burnes, Donald W. | 2 |
JACOBS, JAMES N. | 2 |
Moss, Richard L. | 2 |
AHLSTROM, CLYDE J. | 1 |
Anderson, Lee | 1 |
Bartell, Ted | 1 |
Bateman, Peter | 1 |
CLARK, ANN D. | 1 |
COSTA, EDWARD T. | 1 |
DELAYO, LEONARD | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
Policymakers | 14 |
Researchers | 4 |
Practitioners | 1 |
Location
Georgia | 4 |
Ohio | 4 |
Arkansas | 3 |
California | 3 |
Kansas | 3 |
New York | 3 |
Pennsylvania | 3 |
Arizona | 2 |
Connecticut | 2 |
Kentucky | 2 |
New York (New York) | 2 |
More ▼ |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
California Achievement Tests | 2 |
Stanford Achievement Tests | 2 |
Comprehensive Tests of Basic… | 1 |
Metropolitan Achievement Tests | 1 |
Sequential Tests of… | 1 |
Stanford Diagnostic Reading… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, Washington, DC. – 1977
This document presents an overview of the basis for the program requirements applicable to local school districts applying for grants under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965. The study's basic research objective is to determine what additions, deletions, or clarifications are needed within the Title I legal framework to…
Descriptors: Compensatory Education, Definitions, Federal Legislation, Federal Programs
Oregon State Dept. of Education, Salem. – 1977
The amended guidelines for Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act, as revised by the Oregon Department of Education, are presented in this document. It consolidates instructions for completing applications. The purpose of Title I is explained briefly. The first two steps prior to applying are to identify the project target area or…
Descriptors: Compensatory Education, Cooperative Programs, Coordination, Federal Programs
Congress of the U.S., Washington, DC. House Committee on Education and Labor. – 1991
As approved by the Committee on Education and Labor, House Resolution 2312 clarifies the intent of Congress with regard to several provisions enacted into law by the Augustus F. Hawkins Human Services Reauthorization Act of 1990. The resolution also makes technical and conforming corrections to the Follow Through Act and the Head Start Transition…
Descriptors: Compensatory Education, Elementary Education, Federal Legislation, Federal Programs
Georgia State Dept. of Education, Atlanta. Office of Instructional Services. – 1977
This manual provides regulations to assist local education agencies in Georgia in planning, designing and implementing programs of compensatory education for Title I eligible children. The areas considered under program planning include: the responsibilities of local educational agencies, allocation and reallocation of funds, accounting of fiscal…
Descriptors: Compensatory Education, Cooperative Programs, Coordination, Federal Programs
Fox, Louise W. – 1969
It is claimed that the funded program, the subject of this study, never existed per se, except on paper. It was found that over half of the schools did not receive new project personnel designated under program guidelines. Moreover, substantial numbers of principals and teachers did not even know their schools were participating in the program.…
Descriptors: Attendance, Compensatory Education, Federal Programs, Program Administration
Gall, Mary Sheila – 1991
This report provides results of a review of the methodology used by the Office of Human Development Services (HDS) to measure Head Start performance and to control high risk Head Start agencies. The review was performed at HDS headquarters and regional locations nationwide. The review was based on a sample of 200 Head Start agencies and focused on…
Descriptors: Compensatory Education, Efficiency, Evaluation Criteria, Federal Programs

Zusman, Richard – Integrated Education, 1974
Emphasizes that their participation will develop more comprehensive needs assessment and evaluation procedures; part of the Title I funds will go directly back to the target areas, and parent involvement will result in better acceptance of Title I throughout the communities. (Author/JM)
Descriptors: Advisory Committees, Community Attitudes, Compensatory Education, Educational Change
Thiemann, Francis C.; Deflaminis, John A. – 1978
This paper summarizes a study of Title I regulations and related problems which local administrators in Jefferson County, Kentucky dealt with. More specifically, the study determined which, if any, regulations were significant factors which created problems in the desegregation process and what administrative actions were taken to overcome them.…
Descriptors: Compensatory Education, Desegregation Effects, Desegregation Plans, Educational Problems

Reisner, Elizabeth R. – 1980
The purpose of this report is to review the actions of the United States Office of Education (OE) in the administration and operation of Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act, as amended by the 1978 Education Amendments. The report describes the changes Congress mandated OE to implement and examines OE's response to these specific…
Descriptors: Compensatory Education, Elementary Secondary Education, Federal Legislation, Federal Programs
Minneapolis Public Schools, Minn. – 1966
THESE ABSTRACTS DESCRIBE TITLE I COMPENSATORY EDUCATION PROJECTS CONDUCTED FOR DISADVANTAGED YOUTH IN THE MINNEAPOLIS PUBLIC SCHOOLS DURING 1965-66. EACH ABSTRACT LISTS THE PROJECT'S ADMINISTRATOR, APPROVAL DATE AND DURATION, BUDGET, PARTICIPATING SCHOOLS, AND PERSONNEL, AND PROVIDES A BRIEF NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION OF EACH PROJECT. (LB)
Descriptors: Abstracts, Budgets, Compensatory Education, Disadvantaged Youth
KENYON, RAYMOND G. – 1966
THIS REPORT CONTAINS THE RESULTS OF A QUESTIONNAIRE SURVEY OF TITLE I PROJECT DEVELOPMENT. A QUESTIONNAIRE REQUESTED THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION--NAME OF PERSON RESPONSIBLE FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PROJECT, PROJECT DESCRIPTION, TYPE OF PROJECT (CURRICULUM, MULTIMEDIA, STUDENT-PERSONNEL SERVICES, ADMINISTRATIVE, OR OTHER), NUMBER OF PUPILS SERVED,…
Descriptors: Compensatory Education, Disadvantaged Youth, Evaluation Methods, Federal Programs
Krulee, Gilbert K.; And Others – 1973
The purpose of this study is to provide an assessment of the Follow Through organization and its major components in order to identify problems in functioning and to suggest possible organizational changes that would lead to improved functioning. Each of the major components of Follow Through - the Follow Through Office, the sponsors, local…
Descriptors: Administrative Organization, Bureaucracy, Compensatory Education, Federal Programs
National Inst. of Education (DHEW), Washington, DC. – 1978
This report provides an overview of study findings and a summary of each of the more than 35 research projects which make up the whole NIE Compensatory Education Study. General information on each of the projects is provided, as well as specific references to more detailed discussions. The studies included are divided into five major areas: (1)…
Descriptors: Ancillary Services, Compensatory Education, Federal Programs, Program Administration
Burnes, Donald W.; Moss, Richard L. – IRCD Bulletin, 1978
This paper discusses Federal Title I administration, and focuses on the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare's activity in rulemaking and monitoring and enforcement. It also examines some of the similarities and differences in the ways states manage Title I and the implications of these strategies for local districts, particularly urban…
Descriptors: Compensatory Education, Cooperative Programs, Coordination, Federal Programs

Moore, Mary T.; And Others – Education and Urban Society, 1983
A study was conducted to examine how a broad combination of federal education programs (in operation in 1981-82) affected states' administration of federal and related state programs. Results did not confirm assessments of federal education programs as administratively burdensome and excessively restrictive at the state level. (Author/GC)
Descriptors: Compensatory Education, Compliance (Legal), Equal Education, Federal Programs