NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 15 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Bitchener, John; Knoch, Ute – Language Teaching, 2015
The question of whether written corrective feedback (CF) has a role to play in second language (L2) development has been controversial since Truscott (1996) published an article in "Language Learning" calling for the abandonment of the practice on theoretical, empirical and pedagogical grounds. As a result of his claims, an on-going…
Descriptors: Error Correction, Feedback (Response), Second Language Learning, Second Language Instruction
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Bitchener, John – Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 2016
The focus of this article is on the written feedback that supervisors say they often give their second language (L2) doctoral students. Little is known about the focus of this feedback and about what supervisors consider as priorities in the early draft writing of dissertation chapters. Given the potentially different priorities and foci of…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Feedback (Response), Written Language, Applied Linguistics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Bitchener, John – Journal of Second Language Writing, 2012
For more than 30 years, different opinions about whether written corrective feedback (CF) is a worthwhile pedagogical practice for L2 learning and acquisition have been voiced. Despite the arguments for and against its potential to help L2 learners acquire the target language and the inconclusive findings across studies that have sought answers to…
Descriptors: English (Second Language), Feedback (Response), Second Language Learning, Error Correction
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Basturkmen, Helen; East, Martin; Bitchener, John – Teaching in Higher Education, 2014
Supervising masters and doctoral dissertations is a key function of teaching in higher education and giving written feedback on draft sections is an essential component of this function. However, the specific types of response that supervisors give to their dissertation students' written work have received limited research interest to date. The…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Higher Education, Supervisors, Masters Theses
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
East, Martin; Bitchener, John; Basturkmen, Helen – Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 2012
Many Western universities are experiencing considerable growth in the numbers of postgraduate research students, both local and international. This increase and diversification bring with them challenges for how to make these students' research studies successful. In particular, what students may wish to receive by way of supervisor-student…
Descriptors: Evidence, Feedback (Response), English, Graduate Students
Bitchener, John; Ferris, Dana R. – Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 2011
What should language and writing teachers do about giving students written corrective feedback? This book surveys theory, research, and practice on the important and sometimes controversial issue of written corrective feedback, also known as "error/grammar correction," and its impact on second language acquisition and second language writing…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Writing (Composition), Second Languages, Error Correction
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Rummel, Stephanie; Bitchener, John – Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 2015
This article presents the results of a study examining the effectiveness of written corrective feedback (CF) on the simple past tense and the impact beliefs may have on students' uptake of the feedback they receive. A seven-week study was carried out with 42 advanced EFL learners in Vientiane, Laos. Students' beliefs about written CF were first…
Descriptors: Error Correction, Pretests Posttests, Cues, Grammar
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Bitchener, John; Knoch, Ute – System: An International Journal of Educational Technology and Applied Linguistics, 2009
The effectiveness of different types of written corrective feedback has been investigated over the last twenty years but it is still not possible to make firm conclusions about which options are the most beneficial to ESL learners. This article first provides an overview of the currently available research findings and then presents the results of…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Linguistics, Error Correction, Foreign Countries
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Bitchener, John; Knoch, Ute – ELT Journal, 2009
Investigations into the most effective ways to provide ESL learners with written corrective feedback have often been overly comprehensive in the range of error categories examined. As a result, clear conclusions about the efficacy of such feedback have not been possible. On the other hand, oral corrective feedback studies have produced clear,…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Control Groups, Investigations, Error Correction
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Bitchener, John; Knoch, Ute – Applied Linguistics, 2010
The call for longitudinal evidence on the efficacy of written corrective feedback (WCF) for ESL (English as a second language) writers has been made repeatedly since Truscott (1996) claimed that it is ineffective, harmful, and should therefore be abandoned. This article discusses some of the theoretical issues raised against the practice, outlines…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Control Groups, Written Language, Foreign Countries
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Bitchener, John; Knoch, Ute – Journal of Second Language Writing, 2010
This article presents the findings of a study that investigated (1) the extent to which written corrective feedback (CF) can help advanced L2 learners, who already demonstrate a high level of accuracy in two functional uses of the English article system (the use of "a" for first mention and "the" for subsequent or anaphoric mentions), further…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Error Correction, Second Language Learning, Advanced Students
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Bitchener, John; Basturkmen, Helen; East, Martin – International Journal of English Studies, 2010
Written feedback on drafts of a thesis or dissertation is arguably the most important source of input on what is required or expected of thesis-writing students by the academic community. Despite its importance, relatively little is known about what type of information supervisors focus on when giving feedback. This article presents the findings…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Feedback (Response), Interpersonal Communication, Doctoral Dissertations
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Bitchener, John – Journal of Second Language Writing, 2008
The extent to which ESL learners benefit from written corrective feedback has been debated at length since Truscott (1996) mounted a case for its abolition. Ten years later, the debate continues, not only because little attention has been given to testing its efficacy over time but also because studies that have investigated the issue have not…
Descriptors: Control Groups, Metalinguistics, Feedback (Response), Foreign Countries
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Zhao, Susan Yuqin; Bitchener, John – System: An International Journal of Educational Technology and Applied Linguistics, 2007
Current attention in L2 acquisition research focuses on the integration of message-focused and form-focused instruction. One way to accomplish this is through the incidental focus on form during meaning-focused activities. Some studies have investigated incidental focus on form in different contexts and shown that it exists in L2 classes and…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Teacher Student Relationship, Language Acquisition, Second Language Instruction
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Bitchener, John; Knoch, Ute – Language Teaching Research, 2008
This article provides an overview of research that has investigated the effectiveness of written corrective feedback (WCF) on ESL student writing. In doing so, it highlights a number of shortcomings in the design of some studies and explains what needs to be done in future research so that answers to the issues that have been raised can be…
Descriptors: Metalinguistics, Feedback (Response), Error Correction, Foreign Countries