Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Feedback (Response) | 2 |
| Psychology | 2 |
| Academic Achievement | 1 |
| Achievement Gains | 1 |
| Assignments | 1 |
| Attitude Measures | 1 |
| College Freshmen | 1 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Editing | 1 |
| Educational Strategies | 1 |
| Foreign Countries | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Psychology Learning and… | 2 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 2 |
| Postsecondary Education | 2 |
Audience
Location
| United Kingdom (Scotland) | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Writing Apprehension Test | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkKuepper-Tetzel, Carolina E.; Gardner, Paul L. – Psychology Learning and Teaching, 2021
Although feedback engagement is important for learning, students often do not engage with provided feedback to inform future assignments. One factor for low feedback uptake is the easy access to grades. Thus, systematically delaying the grade release in favor of providing feedback first--"temporary mark withholding"--may increase…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Learning Processes, Grades (Scholastic), Educational Strategies
Ludemann, Pamela M.; McMakin, Deborah – Psychology Learning and Teaching, 2014
The perceived value of peer editing to students is unclear. To investigate, first-year students (N = 35) completed a writing attitudes scale and first writing assignment in September 2012. The expected writing requirements were explained and handouts provided, as well as subsequent instructor feedback and grades. A second writing assignment was…
Descriptors: College Freshmen, Student Attitudes, Peer Evaluation, Editing
