NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Meets WWC Standards with or without Reservations1
Showing 1 to 15 of 25 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Meghan Velez; Zackery Reed; Darryl Chamberlain; Cihan Aydiner – Thresholds in Education, 2025
In fewer than two years, generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) has transformed the educational experience for both students and faculty. Writing feedback and evaluation tools like MyEssayFeedback, EssayGrader, and Markr have been released with the promise that faculty will be able to focus more on teaching than simply grading. However, the…
Descriptors: Writing Across the Curriculum, Artificial Intelligence, Feedback (Response), Scores
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Freitas, Kripa – Journal of Economic Education, 2023
Evidence suggests that active engagement with material as it is being taught improves learning. In-class multiple choice questions are a common way to introduce active learning. Low-stakes writing is another. The author of this article provides evidence that using a content-based low-stakes writing prompt with immediate group feedback during the…
Descriptors: Writing Assignments, Active Learning, Feedback (Response), Instructional Effectiveness
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Halim, Audrey S.; Finkenstaedt-Quinn, Solaire A.; Olsen, Laura J.; Gere, Anne Ruggles; Shultz, Ginger V. – CBE - Life Sciences Education, 2018
Student misconceptions are an obstacle in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics courses and unless remediated may continue causing difficulties in learning as students advance in their studies. Writing-to-learn assignments (WTL) are characterized by their ability to promote in-depth conceptual learning by allowing students to explore…
Descriptors: Misconceptions, Science Instruction, Biology, Introductory Courses
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Sedlacek, Quentin C. – International Journal of Science Education, 2021
Writing activities can function as powerful teaching tools in science education -- but are their benefits realised equitably? The answer may depend in part on how teachers interpret and respond to student writing in light of societal stereotypes that link scientific competence, linguistic competence, and racial, ethnic, or gender identity. In this…
Descriptors: Biology, Science Teachers, Gender Bias, Racial Bias
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Ruane, Sinéad G.; Chappell, Stacie – Management Teaching Review, 2018
Although written communication is a foundational skill, especially for careers in management, faculty can be reluctant to utilize writing assignments for a number of reasons including the subjective nature of and time involved in grading. In this article, we present the IDEAL framework--an andragogical tool developed in an effort to address these…
Descriptors: Writing Skills, Skill Development, Management Development, Guidelines
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Mertz, Pamela; Streu, Craig – Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 2015
This article describes a synergistic two-semester writing sequence for biochemistry courses. In the first semester, students select a putative protein and are tasked with researching their protein largely through bioinformatics resources. In the second semester, students develop original ideas and present them in the form of a research grant…
Descriptors: Biochemistry, Active Learning, Inquiry, Content Area Writing
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Baker, Kimberly M. – Active Learning in Higher Education, 2016
Peer review is an established strategy for improving the quality of students' writing. This study moves beyond the focus on outcomes to assess the peer-review process. In particular, this study focuses on the timing of the peer review, a highly structured feedback form, and student writers' revisions after engaging in peer review. This study draws…
Descriptors: Writing Processes, Writing Improvement, Peer Evaluation, Feedback (Response)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Howard, Sarah K.; Khosronejad, Maryam; Calvo, Rafael A. – European Journal of Engineering Education, 2017
To be fully prepared for the professional workplace, Engineering students need to be able to effectively communicate. However, there has been a growing concern in the field about students' preparedness for this aspect of their future work. It is argued that online writing tools, to engage numbers of students in the writing process, can support…
Descriptors: Engineering Education, Writing Processes, Writing Skills, Content Area Writing
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Moskovitz, Cary – Advances in Engineering Education, 2017
This paper reports on a 3-year study utilizing a novel approach to providing students in an introductory engineering course with feedback on drafts of course writing projects. In the Volunteer Expert Reader (VER) approach, students are matched with university alumni or employees who have the background to give feedback from the perspective of the…
Descriptors: Undergraduate Students, Engineering Education, Introductory Courses, Feedback (Response)
Wang, Jia; Herman, Joan L.; Epstein, Scott; Leon, Seth; Haubner, Julie; La Torre, Deborah; Bozeman, Velette – National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST), 2018
The Literacy Design Collaborative (LDC) was created to support teachers in implementing college and career readiness standards in order to teach literacy skills throughout the content areas. Teachers work collaboratively with coaches to further develop their expertise and design standards-driven, literacy-rich writing assignments within their…
Descriptors: Literacy Education, Career Readiness, College Readiness, Standards
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
White, Diana – PRIMUS, 2014
History of math courses are commonly offered in mathematics departments. Such courses naturally lend themselves to writing assignments, and a growing body of research supports writing as a means to learn mathematics. This article details two such assignments, providing an overview of the course in which they are situated, and a student-led…
Descriptors: Mathematics Instruction, College Mathematics, Undergraduate Students, Student Surveys
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Weld, Christopher – PRIMUS, 2014
Providing audio files in lieu of written remarks on graded assignments is arguably a more effective means of feedback, allowing students to better process and understand the critique and improve their future work. With emerging technologies and software, this audio feedback alternative to the traditional paradigm of providing written comments…
Descriptors: College Mathematics, Content Area Writing, Audio Equipment, Feedback (Response)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Burgess-Proctor, Amanda; Cassano, Graham; Condron, Dennis J.; Lyons, Heidi A.; Sanders, George – Teaching Sociology, 2014
Nationwide, academic sociologists at all types of higher education institutions face the challenge of working to improve students' writing skills. In this article, we describe a collective effort by a group of faculty members in one undergraduate sociology program to implement several effective writing-improvement strategies. We advocate…
Descriptors: Sociology, Undergraduate Students, Writing Skills, Content Area Writing
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Moskovitz, Cary – Across the Disciplines, 2014
This paper reports on a novel approach to providing undergraduates with feedback on STEM writing assignments via an otherwise untapped educational resource: university alumni and employees who normally play no role in the institution's educational mission. In the Volunteer Expert Reader (VER) approach, students are paired with volunteers whose…
Descriptors: STEM Education, Volunteers, Undergraduate Students, Feedback (Response)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Sopina, Elizaveta; McNeill, Rob – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2015
Feedback can have a great impact on student learning. However, in order for it to be effective, feedback needs to be of high quality. Electronic marking has been one of the latest adaptations of technology in teaching and offers a new format of delivering feedback. There is little research investigating the impact the format of feedback has on…
Descriptors: Higher Education, Feedback (Response), Delivery Systems, Computer Assisted Testing
Previous Page | Next Page »
Pages: 1  |  2