NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Audience
Teachers1
Location
New Zealand1
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing all 7 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Martin Boswell; Stephen Marshall; Kate Thornton – Quality in Higher Education, 2024
This article presents findings from a longitudinal case study of academic audit as enacted at a typical New Zealand university between 1994 and 2019. Academic audit is a higher education quality assurance methodology applied to New Zealand universities. The longitudinal study yielded findings that could not have been detected in a single,…
Descriptors: Educational Quality, Quality Assurance, Audits (Verification), Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Steffen Steinert; Lars Krupp; Karina E. Avila; Anke S. Janssen; Verena Ruf; David Dzsotjan; Christian De Schryver; Jakob Karolus; Stefan Ruzika; Karen Joisten; Paul Lukowicz; Jochen Kuhn; Norbert Wehn; Stefan Küchemann – Education and Information Technologies, 2025
As distance learning becomes increasingly important and artificial intelligence tools continue to advance, automated systems for individual learning have attracted significant attention. However, the scarcity of open-source online tools that are capable of providing personalized feedback has restricted the widespread implementation of…
Descriptors: Higher Education, Open Educational Resources, STEM Education, Feedback (Response)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Love, Hailey R.; Horn, Eva; An, Zhe – Teacher Education and Special Education, 2019
Making data-based decisions is a pervasive expectation for educators and is linked to improved outcomes for students. Observational data collection for progress monitoring, in particular, can help educators track and support students' progress toward individualized educational goals in inclusive settings. Yet, many educators struggle with data…
Descriptors: Teaching Methods, Data Collection, Observation, Early Childhood Teachers
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Ewing, Molly – Science Teacher, 2015
The Educators Evaluating the Quality of Instructional Products (EQuIP) Rubric for science is a new tool for science educators that provides criteria by which to examine the alignment and overall quality of lessons and units with respect to the "Next Generation Science Standards" ("NGSS"). The rubric criteria are divided into…
Descriptors: Success, Scoring Rubrics, Educational Quality, Evaluation Criteria
Del Grosso, Patricia; Thomas, Jaime; Fung, Nickie; Levere, Michael; Albanese, Scilla – US Department of Health and Human Services, 2020
Prior research suggests that partnerships in early care and education have the potential to enhance the quality of care and offer comprehensive services to more children and families. This brief draws on data from the national descriptive study of Early Head Start-Child Care (EHS-CC) Partnerships to describe the activities partnerships engage in…
Descriptors: Early Childhood Education, Early Intervention, Child Care, Partnerships in Education
Del Grosso, Patricia; Thomas, Jaime; Makowsky, Libby; Levere, Michael; Fung, Nickie; Paulsell, Diane – US Department of Health and Human Services, 2019
High quality early learning experiences can promote young children's development and help to reduce achievement gaps between children from low-income families and children from more affluent families. Early care and education programs also promote parents' ability to support their children's learning, and allow parents to work or go to school.…
Descriptors: Early Childhood Education, Early Intervention, Child Care, Partnerships in Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Graham, Steve; Hebert, Michael; Harris, Karen R. – Elementary School Journal, 2015
To determine whether formative writing assessments that are directly tied to everyday classroom teaching and learning enhance students' writing performance, we conducted a meta-analysis of true and quasi-experiments conducted with students in grades 1 to 8. We found that feedback to students about writing from adults, peers, self, and computers…
Descriptors: Formative Evaluation, Meta Analysis, Writing Tests, Quasiexperimental Design