Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Error Correction | 2 |
| Feedback (Response) | 2 |
| Syntax | 2 |
| Writing Evaluation | 2 |
| Written Language | 2 |
| Accuracy | 1 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Difficulty Level | 1 |
| Educational Benefits | 1 |
| Error Patterns | 1 |
| Graduate Students | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
| Tests/Questionnaires | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 2 |
| Postsecondary Education | 2 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Download full textEckstein, Grant; Sims, Maureen; Rohm, Lisa – TESL Canada Journal, 2020
Dynamic written corrective feedback (DWCF) is a pedagogical approach that offers meaningful, manageable, constant, and timely corrective feedback on student writing (Hartshorn et al., 2010). It emphasizes indirect and comprehensive written error correction on short, daily writing assignments. Numerous studies have demonstrated that its use can…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Written Language, Error Correction, Time Factors (Learning)
Leow, Ronald P.; Thinglum, Anne; Leow, Stephanie A. – Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 2022
Whether type of written corrective feedback (WCF) impacts L2 learning has been investigated for decades. While many product-oriented studies report conflicting findings, the paucity of studies adopting both a process-oriented and curricular approach (e.g., Caras, 2019) underscores the call for further research on: (1) the processing dimension of…
Descriptors: Error Correction, Second Language Learning, Second Language Instruction, Spanish
