NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 14 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Long, Madeleine; Shukla, Vishakha; Rubio-Fernandez, Paula – Child Development, 2021
Similes require two different pragmatic skills: appreciating the intended similarity and deriving a scalar implicature (e.g., "Lucy is like a parrot" normally implies that Lucy is not a parrot), but previous studies overlooked this second skill. In Experiment 1, preschoolers (N = 48; ages 3-5) understood "X is like a Y" as an…
Descriptors: Figurative Language, Pragmatics, Preschool Children, Child Language
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Starr, Ariel; Cirolia, Alagia J.; Tillman, Katharine A.; Srinivasan, Mahesh – Child Development, 2021
Why are spatial metaphors, like the use of "high" to describe a musical pitch, so common? This study tested one hundred and fifty-four 3- to 5-year-old English-learning children on their ability to learn a novel adjective in the domain of space or pitch and to extend this adjective to the untrained dimension. Children were more…
Descriptors: Figurative Language, Language Acquisition, Vocabulary Development, Music
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Filippova, Eva; Astington, Janet Wilde – Child Development, 2010
To bridge the social-reasoning focus of developmental research on irony understanding and the pragmatic focus of research with adult populations, this cross-sectional study examines 5-, 7-, and 9-year-olds' (n = 72) developing understanding of both social-cognitive and social-communicative aspects of discourse irony, when compared with adults (n =…
Descriptors: Figurative Language, Theory Practice Relationship, Social Cognition, Interpersonal Competence
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Filippova, Eva; Astington, Janet Wilde – Child Development, 2008
This study describes the development of social reasoning in school-age children. An irony task is used to assess 5-, 7-, and 9-year-olds' (N = 72) and adults' (N = 24) recursive understanding of others' minds. Guttman scale analysis demonstrates that in order to understand a speaker's communicative intention, a child needs to recognize the…
Descriptors: Figurative Language, Language Aptitude, Cognitive Development, Social Cognition
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Ganea, Patricia A.; Saylor, Megan M. – Child Development, 2007
Do infants use past linguistic information to interpret an ambiguous request for an object? When infants in this research were shown 2 objects, and asked for 1 with an indefinite request (e.g., "Can you get it for me?"), both 15- and 18-month-olds used the speaker's previous reference to an absent object to interpret the request. The 18-month-olds…
Descriptors: Linguistics, Infants, Interpretive Skills, Figurative Language
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Waggoner, John E.; And Others – Child Development, 1985
Metaphors were embedded at Reaction or Outcome positions in a story grammar structural form. Recall of metaphors and literal statements with comparable meanings was equal among seven-, nine-, and 11-year-olds. Recall was better if statements were in the Outcome position, but metaphors were comprehended equally well in both positions and had no…
Descriptors: Children, Comprehension, Context Effect, Figurative Language
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Kosslyn, Stephen M.; Bower, Gordon H. – Child Development, 1974
This experiment tested whether children rely (relatively more than adults) on sensory imagery as the internal representation of sentences in memory. Age differences were found. (ST)
Descriptors: Adults, Age Differences, Figurative Language, Imagery
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Dent, Cathy H. – Child Development, 1984
Investigates the perceptual basis of metaphor by asking 5-, 7-, and 10-year-old children and adults to pair and discuss films of natural objects, both stationary and moving. Concludes that motion information makes metaphoric similarity relatively easy to perceive and influences the form of descriptive metaphors. (Author/CB)
Descriptors: Age Differences, Children, Classification, Figurative Language
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Gardner, Howard – Child Development, 1974
The capacity to appreciate and produce metaphoric language was studied in 3 1/2 - 19-year olds. It was found that children could understand some metaphors, and there was improvement with age. (ST)
Descriptors: Adolescents, Age Differences, Elementary School Students, Figurative Language
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Dent, Cathy; Rosenberg, Lois – Child Development, 1990
Subjects were 30 participants at each of 4 ages: 5, 7, and 10 years, and adult. Subjects described objects ordered in pairs. Children of 5 and 7 years improved their ability to understand visual metaphors which display a topic-visual interaction. From age 5 to adulthood, subjects improved their ability to comprehend metaphoric similarity. (RH)
Descriptors: Adults, Age Differences, Children, Cognitive Ability
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Ackerman, Brian P. – Child Development, 1982
Examines whether young children and adults are able to interpret sarcastic utterances and whether placements of contextual information before or after the utterance differentially affect interpretation. Results obtained from first and third graders and from college students indicated that different placements of contextual information do affect…
Descriptors: Adults, Age Differences, Children, Communication Skills
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Malgady, Robert G. – Child Development, 1977
Presents a developmental study of children's understanding and appreciation of figurative language. Results replicated previous findings that kindergarten children are capable of interpreting figurative language whereas appreciation appears to require increased cognitive sophistication. (JMB)
Descriptors: Abstract Reasoning, Age Differences, Cognitive Development, Comprehension
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Reynolds, Ralph E.; Ortony, Andrew – Child Development, 1980
Subjects ranging in age from 7 to 12 years selected correct story completion alternatives significantly more often when these alternatives were similes than when they were semantically equivalent metaphors, and when alternatives specifically denoted the referent of the metaphorical comparison than when the identity of the referent had to be…
Descriptors: Child Language, Cognitive Ability, Comprehension, Elementary Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Vosniadou, Stella; And Others – Child Development, 1984
Reports three experiments which examined preschool, first-grade, and third-grade children's understanding of metaphorical language. Subjects acted out short stories which ended in metaphorical sentences by using toys. Predictability of the story endings and the complexity of the metaphorical sentences are found to affect metaphor comprehension.…
Descriptors: Age Differences, Children, Cognitive Development, Figurative Language