Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Financial Support | 4 |
| Program Evaluation | 4 |
| Research Proposals | 4 |
| Higher Education | 2 |
| Peer Evaluation | 2 |
| Accountability | 1 |
| Awards | 1 |
| Best Practices | 1 |
| Capacity Building | 1 |
| Case Studies | 1 |
| College Science | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
| Reports - General | 1 |
Education Level
| Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
| Higher Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Ireland | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Download full textMurphy, Jennifer; Brennan, Aimie – National Academy for Integration of Research, Teaching and Learning (NJ1), 2011
The mission of the National Academy for Integration of Research, Teaching and Learning (NAIRTL) is to ensure that all higher education students are exposed to cutting edge research in their classrooms, and that students at undergraduate and postgraduate levels are actively engaged in relevant and authentic research in their chosen discipline. To…
Descriptors: Program Effectiveness, Teaching Methods, Foreign Countries, Grants
Peer reviewedCheney-Stern, Marilyn; Evans, Rupert N. – Journal of Vocational Education Research, 1979
One means of ensuring the desired impact of educational research is continuity. This factor has several dimensions: continuity of effort, goals, funding, results, evaluation, and impact specifications. (SK)
Descriptors: Educational Research, Financial Support, Objectives, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewedSanders, Howard J. – Chemical and Engineering News, 1982
Summarizes and reviews the peer review system of evaluating research proposals by the National Science Foundation (NSF) and the National Institute of Health. Includes National Academy of Sciences study of NSF peer review, appeals mechanism, and alternatives to peer review, such as Black grants and research productivity criteria. (SK)
Descriptors: College Science, Financial Support, Higher Education, Peer Evaluation
National Commission on Research, Washington, DC. – 1980
Issues concerning review processes used to select research to be performed in universities and sunported by the federal government are discussed. Recommendations regarding review processes, with special emphasis on the peer review system, are offered. It is proposed that review processes serve government and researchers' purposes of assuring that…
Descriptors: Accountability, Colleges, Evaluation Criteria, Federal Aid
