Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 6 |
Descriptor
Foreign Countries | 6 |
Factor Analysis | 5 |
Interpersonal Relationship | 5 |
Measures (Individuals) | 5 |
Reliability | 3 |
Validity | 3 |
College Students | 2 |
Correlation | 2 |
Factor Structure | 2 |
Psychological Patterns | 2 |
Questionnaires | 2 |
More ▼ |
Author
Lafontaine, Marie-France | 2 |
Akbas, Turan | 1 |
Avci, Rasit | 1 |
Caron, Angela | 1 |
Chan, Cecilia L. W. | 1 |
Chonody, Jill M. | 1 |
Chu, Amanda M. Y. | 1 |
Dunk-West, Priscilla | 1 |
Fitzpatrick, Josée | 1 |
Gabb, Jacqui | 1 |
Killian, Mike | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 6 |
Reports - Research | 6 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 3 |
Postsecondary Education | 3 |
Junior High Schools | 1 |
Middle Schools | 1 |
Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
Dyadic Adjustment Scale | 6 |
Locke Wallace Marital… | 1 |
Marlowe Crowne Social… | 1 |
Multidimensional… | 1 |
UCLA Loneliness Scale | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Chonody, Jill M.; Gabb, Jacqui; Killian, Mike; Dunk-West, Priscilla – Research on Social Work Practice, 2018
Objective: This study reports on the operationalization and testing of the newly developed Relationship Quality (RQ) scale, designed to assess an individual's perception of his or her RQ in their current partnership. Methods: Data were generated through extended sampling from an original U.K.-based research project, "Enduring Love? Couple…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Interpersonal Relationship, Measures (Individuals), Test Validity
Lee, Ji-yeon; Shin, Yun-Jeong – Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 2019
The goal of this study was to validate the Experience in Close Relationships Scale--Short version (ECR--S) in Korean college students. One item of the attachment avoidance subscale was deleted following confirmatory factor analysis. The results suggest that the ECR--S demonstrated acceptable internal consistency and construct validity.
Descriptors: Interpersonal Relationship, Measures (Individuals), Test Validity, Test Reliability
Levesque, Christine; Lafontaine, Marie-France; Caron, Angela; Fitzpatrick, Josée – Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 2014
The purpose of this study was to validate the English version of the original German Dyadic Coping Inventory. Results indicated that the English version of the Dyadic Coping Inventory is a valid and reliable measure of dyadic coping in a sample of 709 heterosexual university students.
Descriptors: Validity, College Students, Coping, Measures (Individuals)
Avci, Rasit; Çolakkadioglu, Oguzhan; Öz, Aysegül Sükran; Akbas, Turan – Educational Research and Reviews, 2015
The purpose of this study was to adapt "The Boundary Violations Scale" (Madden et al., 2002), which was created to measure the intergenerational boundary violations in families from the perspective of children, to Turkish and to test the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of this instrument. This instrument was developed…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Measures (Individuals), Interpersonal Relationship, Construct Validity
Wong, Lai Cheung; Chu, Amanda M. Y.; Chan, Cecilia L. W. – Research on Social Work Practice, 2014
Objective: Because forgiveness is an important aspect of studies in marital relationships, there is a need for a culturally relevant measure of forgiveness for Chinese couples. This study aims to validate the Transgression-related Interpersonal Motivations Inventory in marital relationships within a Chinese context (C-TRIM). Method: Data were…
Descriptors: Marriage, Foreign Countries, Questionnaires, Asians
Matte, Melody; Lafontaine, Marie-France – Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 2012
The objective of the present study was to provide validity evidence for the scores from the Romantic Relationship Perfectionism Scale. Results indicate a two-factor structure, adequate reliability, and overall good convergent, concurrent, discriminant, and incremental validity evidence. The strengths and limitations of this measure are discussed.…
Descriptors: Validity, Reliability, Factor Structure, Psychometrics