Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 2 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Author
| Bexley, Emmaline | 2 |
| Coates, Hamish | 2 |
| Croucher, Gwilym | 2 |
| Dollinger, Mollie | 2 |
| Grosemans, Ilke | 2 |
| Kelly, Paula | 2 |
| Moore, Kenneth | 2 |
| Weerakkody, Umesha | 2 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 2 |
| Postsecondary Education | 2 |
Audience
Location
| Australia | 2 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Coates, Hamish; Croucher, Gwilym; Weerakkody, Umesha; Moore, Kenneth; Dollinger, Mollie; Kelly, Paula; Bexley, Emmaline; Grosemans, Ilke – Higher Education: The International Journal of Higher Education Research, 2020
Doctoral training continues to grow in scale and scope in Australia, but has been subjected to far less design and improvement compared with other facets of higher education. Governments and universities engage in ongoing change which helps respond to opportunities and challenges but also leads to a proliferation of options and approaches. The…
Descriptors: Doctoral Programs, Program Design, Program Descriptions, Foreign Countries
Coates, Hamish; Croucher, Gwilym; Moore, Kenneth; Weerakkody, Umesha; Dollinger, Mollie; Grosemans, Ilke; Bexley, Emmaline; Kelly, Paula – Higher Education Research and Development, 2020
The growth of the doctorate in recent decades has spawned concerns about programme quality and external relevance. This article reports findings from research conducted in Australia that was shaped by the view that the doctorate remains in need of educational clarification and design. The research generated insights that can be used to modernise…
Descriptors: Doctoral Degrees, Educational Quality, Instructional Design, National Surveys

Peer reviewed
Direct link
