Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Computation | 1 |
| Credentials | 1 |
| Cutting Scores | 1 |
| Difficulty Level | 1 |
| Foreign Countries | 1 |
| Generalizability Theory | 1 |
| Group Discussion | 1 |
| Physicians | 1 |
| Probability | 1 |
| Program Effectiveness | 1 |
| Scoring | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Applied Measurement in… | 1 |
Author
| Chis, Liliana | 1 |
| Clauser, Brian E. | 1 |
| Harik, Polina | 1 |
| Margolis, Melissa J. | 1 |
| McManus, I. C. | 1 |
| Mollon, Jennifer | 1 |
| Williams, Simon | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
| United Kingdom | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkClauser, Brian E.; Harik, Polina; Margolis, Melissa J.; McManus, I. C.; Mollon, Jennifer; Chis, Liliana; Williams, Simon – Applied Measurement in Education, 2009
Numerous studies have compared the Angoff standard-setting procedure to other standard-setting methods, but relatively few studies have evaluated the procedure based on internal criteria. This study uses a generalizability theory framework to evaluate the stability of the estimated cut score. To provide a measure of internal consistency, this…
Descriptors: Generalizability Theory, Group Discussion, Standard Setting (Scoring), Scoring
