Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Data Analysis | 1 |
| Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
| Feedback | 1 |
| Foreign Countries | 1 |
| Formative Evaluation | 1 |
| Item Response Theory | 1 |
| Mathematics Achievement | 1 |
| Measurement | 1 |
| Student Evaluation | 1 |
| Summative Evaluation | 1 |
Source
| Assessment in Education:… | 1 |
Author
| Doig, Brian | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Opinion Papers | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
| Elementary Education | 1 |
| Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
| Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Australia | 1 |
| Canada | 1 |
| Czech Republic | 1 |
| France | 1 |
| Greece | 1 |
| Hungary | 1 |
| Japan | 1 |
| Netherlands | 1 |
| Norway | 1 |
| Singapore | 1 |
| Sweden | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkDoig, Brian – Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 2006
In this paper, I will argue that it is possible to use data from large-scale international and national mathematics assessment programmes, whose attention is on summative achievement, to provide formative information that informs teachers about the effects of their classroom practice. However, to have impact on, and be useful for, classroom…
Descriptors: Measurement, Mathematics Achievement, Formative Evaluation, Summative Evaluation
