NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 8 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Barrot, Jessie S. – Computer Assisted Language Learning, 2023
Despite the building up of research on the adoption of automated writing evaluation (AWE) systems, the differential effects of automated written corrective feedback (AWCF) on errors with different severity levels and gains across writing tasks remain unclear. Thus, this study fills in the vacuum by examining how AWCF through Grammarly affects…
Descriptors: Automation, Written Language, Error Correction, Feedback (Response)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Turgay Han; Elif Sari – Computer Assisted Language Learning, 2024
Feedback is generally regarded as an integral part of EFL writing instruction. Giving individual feedback on students' written products can lead to a demanding, if not insurmountable, task for EFL writing teachers, especially in classes with a large number of students. Several Automated Writing Evaluation (AWE) systems which can provide automated…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Automation, Feedback (Response), English (Second Language)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Zhai, Na; Ma, Xiaomei – Computer Assisted Language Learning, 2022
Automated writing evaluation (AWE) has been used increasingly to provide feedback on student writing. Previous research typically focused on its inter-rater reliability with human graders and validation frameworks. The limited body of research has only discussed students' attitudes or perceptions in general. A systematic investigation of the…
Descriptors: Automation, Writing Evaluation, Feedback (Response), College Students
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Jiang, Lianjiang; Yu, Shulin – Computer Assisted Language Learning, 2022
While automated feedback is becoming readily accessible to student writers, how students employ resources and strategies to use such feedback remains largely unexplored. Informed by activity theory and the construct of appropriation, this study conceptualizes students' use of automated feedback as social appropriation mediated by resources and…
Descriptors: Automation, Feedback (Response), Second Language Learning, Writing Instruction
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Link, Stephanie; Mehrzad, Mohaddeseh; Rahimi, Mohammad – Computer Assisted Language Learning, 2022
Recent years have witnessed an increasing interest in the use of automated writing evaluation (AWE) in second language writing classrooms. This increase is partially due to the belief that AWE can assist teachers by allowing them to devote more feedback to higher-level (HL) writing skills, such as content and organization, while the technology…
Descriptors: Automation, Writing Evaluation, Feedback (Response), Revision (Written Composition)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Evers, Katerina; Chen, Sufen – Computer Assisted Language Learning, 2022
This study examined the difference in adults' pronunciation performance with peer feedback and individual practice when using an automatic speech recognition (ASR) system. The same ASR software was used in both the comparison (n = 31) and the experimental group (n = 33) for 12 weeks. The participants were working adults in Taiwan. During the…
Descriptors: Automation, Computer Assisted Instruction, Speech Communication, Peer Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Li, Rui; Meng, Zhaokun; Tian, Mi; Zhang, Zhiyi; Ni, Chuanbin; Xiao, Wei – Computer Assisted Language Learning, 2019
Automated Writing Evaluation (AWE) has been widely applied in computer-assisted language learning (CALL) in China. However, little is known about factors that influence learners' intention to use AWE. To this end, by adding two external factors (i.e. computer self-efficacy and computer anxiety) to the technology acceptance model (TAM), we surveyed…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, English (Second Language), Second Language Learning, Automation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Lee, Cynthia – Computer Assisted Language Learning, 2020
The aim of this article is to reveal the ways in which six 14- to 15-year-old second language (L2) learners, two each of high, mid, and low English proficiency levels were cognitively engaged in writing while using an automated content feedback program known as the Essay Critiquing System 2.0 in three out of five workshops in a Hong Kong secondary…
Descriptors: Adolescents, Automation, Feedback (Response), Computer Assisted Instruction