Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Computer Science Education | 2 |
| Curriculum Design | 2 |
| Foreign Countries | 2 |
| Introductory Courses | 2 |
| Programming | 2 |
| Programming Languages | 2 |
| Teaching Methods | 2 |
| Academic Ability | 1 |
| Achievement Gains | 1 |
| Apprenticeships | 1 |
| Cohort Analysis | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Arjona-Villicaña, P. David | 1 |
| Castillo-Barrera, F. Edgar | 1 |
| Lakshminarayanan, Srinivasan | 1 |
| Rao, N. J. | 1 |
| Silva-Maceda, Gabriela | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 2 |
| Postsecondary Education | 2 |
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkLakshminarayanan, Srinivasan; Rao, N. J. – Cogent Education, 2021
CS1 courses are designed in Indian Institutions as a lecture course of three to four credits and one credit lab course. The issues related to curriculum design, instruction design, and students' learning manifest themselves as issues in the lab programs. This situation presents the lab instructor with an opportunity to understand and address the…
Descriptors: Computer Science Education, Teaching Methods, Programming, Programming Languages
Silva-Maceda, Gabriela; Arjona-Villicaña, P. David; Castillo-Barrera, F. Edgar – IEEE Transactions on Education, 2016
Learning to program is a complex task, and the impact of different pedagogical approaches to teach this skill has been hard to measure. This study examined the performance data of seven cohorts of students (N = 1168) learning programming under three different pedagogical approaches. These pedagogical approaches varied either in the length of the…
Descriptors: Programming, Teaching Methods, Intermode Differences, Cohort Analysis
