Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Error Patterns | 2 |
Examiners | 2 |
Foreign Countries | 2 |
Academic Achievement | 1 |
Achievement Tests | 1 |
Cognitive Measurement | 1 |
Feedback (Response) | 1 |
Grading | 1 |
Graduate Students | 1 |
Graduate Study | 1 |
Interrater Reliability | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 2 |
Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 1 |
Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Canada | 1 |
United Kingdom (England) | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
Kaufman Test of Educational… | 1 |
Wechsler Individual… | 1 |
Woodcock Johnson Tests of… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Harrison, Gina L.; Goegan, Lauren D.; Macoun, Sarah J. – Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 2019
This study examined the scoring errors across three widely used achievement tests (Kaufman Test of Educational Achievement--Second Edition [KTEA-2], Woodcock--Johnson Tests of Achievement--Third Edition [WJ-III], and the Wechsler Individual Achievement Test--Third Edition [WIAT-III]) by novice examiners. A total of 114 protocols were evaluated for…
Descriptors: Scoring, Error Patterns, Achievement Tests, Novices
Greatorex, Jackie; Bell, John F. – Research Papers in Education, 2008
It is particularly important that GCSE and A-level marking is valid and reliable as it affects the life chances of many young people in England. Current developments in marking technology are coinciding with potential changes in procedures to ensure valid and reliable marking. In this research the effectiveness of procedures to facilitate the…
Descriptors: Scripts, Intervention, Interrater Reliability, Examiners