Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Accuracy | 1 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Evaluation | 1 |
| Expertise | 1 |
| Foreign Countries | 1 |
| Hierarchical Linear Modeling | 1 |
| High Stakes Tests | 1 |
| Instructional Effectiveness | 1 |
| Scoring | 1 |
| Supervisors | 1 |
| Team Training | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Assessment in Education:… | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
| United Kingdom (England) | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkBaird, Jo-Anne; Meadows, Michelle; Leckie, George; Caro, Daniel – Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 2017
This study evaluated rater accuracy with rater-monitoring data from high stakes examinations in England. Rater accuracy was estimated with cross-classified multilevel modelling. The data included face-to-face training and monitoring of 567 raters in 110 teams, across 22 examinations, giving a total of 5500 data points. Two rater-monitoring systems…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, High Stakes Tests, Accuracy, Hierarchical Linear Modeling
