NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 18 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Maja Elmgren; Åsa Lindberg-Sand; Anders Sonesson – Minerva: A Review of Science, Learning and Policy, 2024
The doctorate forms the basis for academic careers and the regeneration of academia, and has increasingly become important for other sectors of society. The latter is reflected in efforts on institutional, national as well as supranational levels to change and adapt the doctoral degree to new expectations. As doctoral education is embedded in…
Descriptors: Doctoral Programs, Committees, Evaluation Methods, Research Universities
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Blockeel, Johan; Chuluunbaatar, Delgermaa; Holley, Aiden; Sulaiman, Rasheed; Djamen, Patrice; Grovermann, Christian – Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 2023
Purpose: To evaluate pluralistic Extension and Advisory Services (EAS) systems performance and outcomes, and share the experiences made with applying a participatory semi-quantitative approach allowing for cross-country comparability. Design/methodology/approach: The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) developed the…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Comparative Education, Rural Extension, Extension Agents
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Mona Farouk Ali – Research Evaluation, 2025
Research evaluation (RE) has experienced a major global transformation prompted by the emergence and increasing usage of digital citation platforms such as the Web of Science and Scopus, opening up avenues for scientometric evaluation (SE). This relatively novel evaluation method represents an essential pillar for the scientific committees for…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Decision Making, Faculty Promotion, Committees
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Braun, Robert; Ravn, Tine; Frankus, Elisabeth – Research Ethics, 2020
In this paper we reflect on the looming question of what constitutes expertise in ethics. Based on an empirical program that involved qualitative and quantitative as well as participatory research elements we show that expertise in research ethics and integrity is based on experience in the assessment processes. We then connect traditional…
Descriptors: Integrity, Ethics, Participatory Research, Qualitative Research
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Fonseca, Susana; Lobo Fernandes, Joana – International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 2022
Purpose: Providing higher education institutions (HEIs) with a tool for self-assessing their social responsibility (SR) that generates the information and knowledge necessary to a strategic approach to adopting the Green Paper recommendations about the SR of HEIs. Setting out the collaborative policy development process to construct the tool…
Descriptors: Self Evaluation (Groups), Sustainability, Alignment (Education), Pilot Projects
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Mackworth-Young, Charles – Journal of Research Administration, 2021
Background: The peer review of clinical research projects is an essential step in project preparation. While some projects undergo rigorous review by grant-giving organizations, this does not apply to all clinical research. In many cases, peer review, if undertaken at all, is not rigorous, fully independent, or timely. Depending on their…
Descriptors: Peer Evaluation, Medical Research, Research Projects, Ethics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Kyvik, Svein – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2014
This article focuses on the assessment procedures of Norwegian PhD theses as viewed by external members of evaluation committees from three countries with different examination systems; the USA, the UK and Sweden. Their viewpoints give useful information not only on the pros and cons with the Norwegian system, but also on the strengths and…
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Foreign Countries, Doctoral Dissertations, International Cooperation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Brandon, Paul R.; Smith, Nick L.; Ofir, Zenda; Noordeloos, Marco – American Journal of Evaluation, 2014
In this Exemplars case, the fifth and final under the direction of the current coeditors, the authors present a reflective account of an ongoing, complex, multiyear, multinational monitoring and evaluation (M&E) system conducted for African Women in Agricultural Research and Development (AWARD), an international development program. The…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Females, Agriculture, Research and Development
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Walker, Allan; Kwan, Paula – Journal of Educational Administration, 2012
Purpose: The purpose of this article is to report a study of the strategies members of principal selection panels use to select the best candidate for a principal position. Design/methodology/approach: The study draws on both qualitative and quantitative data. The quantitative analysis drawn on data collected from school supervisors and school…
Descriptors: Factor Structure, Principals, Preferences, Personnel Selection
Association of Universities in the Netherlands. – 1993
This protocol explains the new system for assessing research quality at research universities located in the Netherlands. It discusses the legal and historical background for establishing a new system of quality determination in research, describes the essential aspects of the research assessment process and the particular tasks of…
Descriptors: Committees, Documentation, Evaluation Methods, Foreign Countries
Lockwood, Geoffrey – International Journal of Institutional Management in Higher Education, 1986
The background, purposes, and methods of institutional efficiency studies conducted at selected British universities are discussed. The evaluations focused on financial management, purchasing, and building maintenance and space utilization. (MSE)
Descriptors: College Administration, Committees, Efficiency, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Staropoli, Andre – European Journal of Education, 1987
A new system in which French higher education policy is evaluated through the policies of each institution is described. Characteristics of the French university and university system are examined, the national evaluation committee's structure is outlined, and the logistics of the evaluation process are discussed. (MSE)
Descriptors: Committees, Educational Policy, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods
Scott, Peter – International Journal of Institutional Management in Higher Education, 1986
The implications of the Britain's Jarratt Committee study of efficiency in selected universities and the politics underlying the study are examined and criticized as self-serving. (MSE)
Descriptors: College Administration, Committees, Efficiency, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Ahgren-Lange, Ulla; And Others – Higher Education Management, 1993
The process and aims of university evaluation are discussed from the perspectives of the evaluation commission, university vice-chancellor, and dean of faculty of forestry at the Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, evaluated by the ministry of agriculture. Focus on the link between quality assessment and educational improvement is…
Descriptors: Administrator Attitudes, Agricultural Education, Change Strategies, College Administration
Australian Council for Educational Research, Hawthorn. – 1984
A review is presented of the operations of the Australian Council for Educational Research (ACER). Overviews are provided of ACER activities and future planning in the following programs: (1) social context of education; (2) measurement and evaluation; (3) learning and teaching; (4) survey and psychometric services; (5) advisory services; and (6)…
Descriptors: Advisory Committees, Educational Research, Educational Sociology, Evaluation Methods
Previous Page | Next Page »
Pages: 1  |  2