NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 4 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Morell, Linda; Collier, Tina; Black, Paul; Wilson, Mark – Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2017
This paper builds on the current literature base about learning progressions in science to address the question, "What is the nature of the learning progression in the content domain of the structure of matter?" We introduce a learning progression in response to that question and illustrate a methodology, the Construct Modeling (Wilson,…
Descriptors: Scientific Concepts, Middle School Students, Public Schools, Models
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Tomanek, Debra; Talanquer, Vicente; Novodvorsky, Ingrid – Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2008
The purpose of this qualitative exploratory study was to identify factors that influenced prospective and experienced secondary level science teachers' reasoning as they evaluated or selected tasks to formatively assess their students' understanding of scientific concepts. The analysis of the coded written responses revealed two categories of…
Descriptors: Student Attitudes, Formative Evaluation, Scientific Concepts, Science Teachers
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Welch, Wayne W. – Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 1973
Summarizes major findings of the Harvard Project Physics research and evaluation activity, including data gathering techniques, descriptions of teacher characteristics, information about student responses and learning environments, and final evaluation year results. Indicates that the evaluation program is characterized by considerable research on…
Descriptors: Curriculum Development, Curriculum Evaluation, Educational Research, Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Yin, Yue; Vanides, Jim; Ruiz-Primo, Maria Araceli; Ayala, Carlos C.; Shavelson, Richard J. – Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2005
We examine the equivalence of two construct-a-concept-map techniques: construct-a-map with created linking phrases (C), and construct-a-map with selected linking phrases (S). The former places few constraints on the respondent and has been considered the gold standard; the latter is cost and time efficient. Both their products and processes are…
Descriptors: Formative Evaluation, Concept Mapping, Comparative Analysis, Scores