Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 5 |
Descriptor
Administrator Evaluation | 15 |
Evaluation Methods | 15 |
Formative Evaluation | 15 |
Summative Evaluation | 10 |
Elementary Secondary Education | 8 |
Evaluation Criteria | 7 |
Foreign Countries | 6 |
Principals | 6 |
Administrator Effectiveness | 5 |
Standards | 5 |
Evaluators | 4 |
More ▼ |
Source
AASA Journal of Scholarship &… | 1 |
Center on Great Teachers and… | 1 |
Educational Management… | 1 |
Journal of Personnel… | 1 |
National Comprehensive Center… | 1 |
Online Submission | 1 |
School Business Affairs | 1 |
Author
Lawton, S. B. | 2 |
Brown-Sims, Melissa | 1 |
Carter, D. S. G. | 1 |
Clifford, Matthew | 1 |
Common, Ronald W. | 1 |
Easton, Peter A. | 1 |
Gaziel, Haim | 1 |
Hansen, Ulcca Joshni | 1 |
Harris, B. | 1 |
Hemati, Hamidreza | 1 |
Henrikson, Robin | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Reports - Research | 6 |
Guides - Non-Classroom | 5 |
Journal Articles | 4 |
Reports - Descriptive | 3 |
Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
Tests/Questionnaires | 2 |
Books | 1 |
Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Elementary Secondary Education | 2 |
Elementary Education | 1 |
Secondary Education | 1 |
Location
Canada | 3 |
Connecticut | 1 |
India | 1 |
Israel | 1 |
Pennsylvania | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Henrikson, Robin – AASA Journal of Scholarship & Practice, 2018
The researcher seeks to address the needed changes to superintendent evaluation by suggesting an integrated formative evaluation process that balances both the need for accountability and ongoing professional growth and support (Hallinger, Heck, & Murphy, 2014; Duke, 1990). The nuances of the superintendent and school board relationship…
Descriptors: Superintendents, Evidence Based Practice, Formative Evaluation, Administrator Evaluation
Clifford, Matthew; Hansen, Ulcca Joshni; Wraight, Sara – Center on Great Teachers and Leaders, 2014
Across the country, states and districts are designing principal evaluation systems as a means of improving leadership, learning, and school performance. Principal evaluation systems hold potential for supporting leaders' learning and sense of accountability for instructional excellence and student performance. Principal evaluation also is an…
Descriptors: Principals, Administrator Evaluation, Program Development, Evaluation Criteria
Hemati, Hamidreza – Online Submission, 2011
The purpose of the research was to study the performance of the supervisors in the aspects leadership, communication, and task managing by the "360 degree feedback" method. A qualitative research was used to carry out the research study. The researcher formulated three questions that guided the study. An opinionnaire which included 23…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Feedback (Response), Qualitative Research, Observation
Brown-Sims, Melissa – National Comprehensive Center for Teacher Quality, 2010
With the need to meet a set of higher accountability standards such as Interstate School Leaders Licensure Consortium (ISLLC) Standards and the AYP benchmarks of the NCLB Act, for example, school principals are faced with the knowledge that they play a vital role in school effectiveness as well as teacher retention, parent participation, and…
Descriptors: School Effectiveness, Educational Improvement, Principals, Instructional Leadership
Gaziel, Haim – Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 2008
Despite the current interest in many countries in assessing the principal's performance, stemming from the greater attention to educational reform and accountability, the empirical study of principal's appraisal has been slow to develop. This article was designed to fill partially this gap. Data was collected by semi-structured interviews of eight…
Descriptors: Formative Evaluation, Performance Based Assessment, Performance Tests, Foreign Countries
Herman, Jerry J. – School Business Affairs, 1990
The specific steps involved in developing an evaluation system for use with school business officials include: (1) purposes of evaluation; (2) cycle to be followed; (3) criteria; (4) types and numbers of performance objectives; (5) data to be used; and (6) procedures to be used in conducting both formative and summative evaluation. (MLF)
Descriptors: Administrator Effectiveness, Administrator Evaluation, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Criteria
Connecticut Principals' Academy, East Lyme. – 1990
Although the initial focus of the reform movement was on teachers, considerable attention has been devoted to administrators--especially principals--since it has been recognized that the quality of a principal's leadership has a significant impact on the effectiveness of the educational programs in our schools. The purpose of this guide is to…
Descriptors: Administrator Effectiveness, Administrator Evaluation, Educational Improvement, Elementary Secondary Education

Carter, D. S. G.; Harris, B. – Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 1991
The newly formed and still evolving National Executive Development Center of the American Association of School Administrators is described. Its mission is to provide a process for guiding professional development of school executives. Considerations regarding the use of assessment data for formative and summative evaluation are discussed. (SLD)
Descriptors: Administrator Evaluation, Agency Role, Assessment Centers (Personnel), Elementary Secondary Education
Stufflebeam, Daniel; And Others – 1995
This guide book contains a model portfolio that is designed for use by school boards in evaluating school superintendents. It can also be adapted to evaluate central-office administrators, principals, and other school-level administrators. The portfolio provides for both formative and summative evaluation. The assessment is keyed to the…
Descriptors: Administrator Evaluation, Board Administrator Relationship, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Criteria
Mielke, Keith W. – 1973
A fundamental distinction is made between basic research which seeks out new, generalizable knowledge, and administrative research which provides information useful to decision makers who have a task to perform. Attention is then given to four types of administrative research: background research, formative research, summative research, and policy…
Descriptors: Administrator Evaluation, Communications, Decision Making, Educational Television
Knoop, Robert; Common, Ronald W. – 1985
The Performance Review, Analysis, and Improvement System for Educators (PRAISE) is a formative evaluation instrument designed to improve the performance of school principals. The system appears to be reliable and valid and is flexible enough to accommodate the needs of a variety of schools. Sample items and categories of the instrument include…
Descriptors: Administrator Evaluation, Computer Oriented Programs, Data Interpretation, Elementary Secondary Education
Council Bluffs Community School District, IA. – 1987
This summary outline presents performance evaluation procedures of the 1986-87 administrator accountability plan adopted by the Council Bluffs Community Schools, Iowa. Procedures ensure that a cooperative evaluation plan is established, there is continuity between evaluation cycles, guidance and assistance are provided, and due process is…
Descriptors: Accountability, Administrator Evaluation, Administrator Responsibility, Board of Education Policy

Easton, Peter A. – 1996
This book is designed to assist evaluators of nonformal education (NFE) and adult education programs in their continuing professional education and in the task of improving their capacities for genuinely formative, informative, and participatory assessment of educational practice. Fourteen chapters are organized into five sections. Section 1…
Descriptors: Administrator Evaluation, Adult Education, Cost Effectiveness, Educational Assessment
Lawton, S. B.; And Others – 1986
This study addresses four questions: (1) What types of performance appraisal policy for educational staff have been adopted by Ontario school boards? (2) To what extent have these policies been implemented in practice? (3) What types of appraisal policies are most effective? and (4) What processes have school boards used to develop and implement…
Descriptors: Administrator Evaluation, Educational Administration, Educational Policy, Elementary Secondary Education
Lawton, S. B.; And Others – 1986
This report, the fourth and final volume of a series, examines in a summary fashion the results from a massive study of performance appraisal policies and procedures currently used in Ontario school boards. The study, a two-year undertaking, focused on appraisal practices for certified educational personnel in Ontario: teachers, principals,…
Descriptors: Administrator Evaluation, Educational Administration, Educational Policy, Elementary Secondary Education