Descriptor
| Evaluation Methods | 4 |
| Formative Evaluation | 4 |
| Program Evaluation | 4 |
| Youth Programs | 4 |
| Summative Evaluation | 2 |
| Vocational Education | 2 |
| Academic Education | 1 |
| Adults | 1 |
| Community Services | 1 |
| Data Collection | 1 |
| Delivery Systems | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Evaluation and Program… | 1 |
Publication Type
| ERIC Digests in Full Text | 1 |
| ERIC Publications | 1 |
| Information Analyses | 1 |
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
| New York | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| Comprehensive Employment and… | 1 |
| Job Training Partnership Act… | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Download full textFlaxman, Erwin; Orr, Margaret – 1996
This digest examines features of both process and impact evaluations to help officials of youth programs assess the programs for which they are responsible. With proper planning, evaluation can be part of a program without having to compete for attention and resources with the services the program is trying to provide. A process evaluation…
Descriptors: Data Collection, Disadvantaged Youth, Evaluation Methods, Formative Evaluation
Wolf, Judith G.; Sylves, David – 1979
The first Niagara County Comprehensive Plan submitted to the New York State Division for Youth in 1977 articulated as its first priority a youth service delivery system. The attainment of this objective involved the simultaneous development of a self-evaluation procedure, which could be used as a basis for decision making. Thirteen social service…
Descriptors: Community Services, Delivery Systems, Evaluation Methods, Formative Evaluation
Peer reviewedCook, Robert F. – Evaluation and Program Planning, 1986
This two-year study is a field network evaluation of the operation of the Job Training Partnership Act (JTPA) Program in 20 randomly selected states and 40 Service Delivery Areas within those states. Methodology is also discussed. (Author/LMO)
Descriptors: Adults, Dislocated Workers, Employment Programs, Evaluation Methods
National School-to-Work Opportunities Office, Washington, DC. – 1996
Building effective school-to-work systems requires evaluation, usually incorporating both process and outcome evaluations. Increasingly, school-to-work systems are conducting self-evaluations or hiring evaluation teams to determine how effectively the system is designed and implemented and whether it is achieving its purposes for students and the…
Descriptors: Academic Education, Education Work Relationship, Educational Practices, Educational Resources
