It is unlikely that the courts will deny universities the right to require mandatory student fees for educational purposes if the criteria for determining and distributing the funds do not exceed statutory purposes, are not arbitrary or capricious, are nondiscriminatory, and do not promote or impose one particular viewpoint. (Author/IRT)

Discussion of means to ensure freedom of expression by college students. Areas of expression noted are student newspapers, lectures by off-campus speakers, freedom to assemble peaceably and freedom to associate. (EK)

The study was designed to answer three questions: (1) What should be the function of the state college's sanctioned student newspaper? (2) What are the legal boundaries which pertain to editorial policies of the student newspaper in relation to student freedom of expression and with which the state college must be concerned? (3) What, if any,…

The legal parameters of individual rights and institutional restraints, as they relate to editorial issues involving the college press, are examined. (Author)

The issue of whether the First Amendments right to freedom of speech applies to commercial vendors on campuses as it does to nonprofit solicitation is addressed and guidelines provided. Banning commercial solicitation from residence halls, but allowing it on a limited basis in campus centers is recommended. (Author/ABB)

Just as traditional student activities, such as speaker series and student newspaper groups, have been considered within the legal mission of colleges and universities, so also must nontraditional groups such as gay students, inasmuch as the institution must treat students and student groups in an egalitarian manner. (Author/MJB)

In the fall 1996 issue of this journal, Maxine Schmitz argued against the California Supreme Court's ruling in "Smith" that the University must provide a partial refund to students objecting to fees used for activities supporting a single political or ideological viewpoint. Annette Gibbs defends the "Smith" majority opinion.…

Examines the extent that educational institutions can regulate face-to-face solicitation. Legal decisions indicate that: (1) regulation is not aimed at commercial content; (2) legitimate college interests include student privacy and the harm posed by high pressure sales tactics; and (3) alternatives for commerical information dissemination must be…

Colleges and universities continue to struggle with their educational prerogatives and their students' constitutional rights while controversies continue to rage over student newspaper activities. Recent court rulings may provide a pragmatic framework for protecting and promoting the goals of the institution as well as insuring student freedom of…

Analyzes the results of recent court cases concerning the constitutionality of mandatory student fees and discusses their implications for student affairs practice. To date, courts have ruled mandatory student activity fees permissible when they do not unduly infringe on students' constitutional rights. Offers eight principles for designing…

This brief paper summarizes a full length report of the same title which examines the ongoing debate on the conflicting rights and responsibilities of students and college administrations in the areas of offensive speech, rights of assembly, drug testing and campus safety. On offensive speech and the rights of colleges and universities to regulate…

This monograph suggests solutions for the conflicts, especially prominent in recent years, between students and higher education institutions concerning their respective rights and responsibilities. The discussion focuses particularly on regulating offensive speech, rights of association and assembly, drug testing for athletes, and student safety…