Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Accuracy | 3 |
Gender Differences | 3 |
Hierarchical Linear Modeling | 3 |
Oral Language | 3 |
Predictor Variables | 3 |
Alphabets | 2 |
Attention | 2 |
Curriculum Based Assessment | 2 |
Elementary School Students | 2 |
Factor Analysis | 2 |
Grade 2 | 2 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 2 |
Reports - Research | 2 |
Dissertations/Theses -… | 1 |
Education Level
Early Childhood Education | 2 |
Elementary Education | 2 |
Grade 2 | 2 |
Grade 3 | 2 |
Primary Education | 2 |
Higher Education | 1 |
Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Pennsylvania | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
Oral and Written Language… | 2 |
Wechsler Individual… | 2 |
Woodcock Johnson Tests of… | 2 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Kim, Young-Suk; Al Otaiba, Stephanie; Wanzek, Jeanne; Gatlin, Brandy – Journal of Educational Psychology, 2015
We had 3 aims in the present study: (a) to examine the dimensionality of various evaluative approaches to scoring writing samples (e.g., quality, productivity, and curriculum-based measurement [CBM] writing scoring), (b) to investigate unique language and cognitive predictors of the identified dimensions, and (c) to examine gender gap in the…
Descriptors: Writing (Composition), Gender Differences, Curriculum Based Assessment, Scoring
Kim, Young-Suk; Al Otaiba, Stephanie; Wanzek, Jeanne; Gatlin, Brandy – Grantee Submission, 2015
We had 3 aims in the present study: (a) to examine the dimensionality of various evaluative approaches to scoring writing samples (e.g., quality, productivity, and curriculum-based measurement [CBM] writing scoring), (b) to investigate unique language and cognitive predictors of the identified dimensions, and (c) to examine gender gap in the…
Descriptors: Writing (Composition), Gender Differences, Curriculum Based Assessment, Scoring
Vercellotti, Mary Lou – ProQuest LLC, 2012
Applied linguists have identified three components of second language (L2) performance: complexity, accuracy, and fluency (CAF) to measure L2 development. Many studies researching CAF found trade-off effects (in which a higher performance in one component corresponds to lower performance in another) during tasks, often in online oral language…
Descriptors: Language Fluency, Accuracy, Difficulty Level, Second Language Learning