Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Author
Bateman, David F. | 1 |
Baxter, Christine M. | 1 |
Gartin, Barbara | 1 |
Hart, Jennifer L. | 1 |
Love, Jessica | 1 |
Marx, Teri A. | 1 |
Menard, Lauren A. | 1 |
Nelson, Leslie | 1 |
Schaefer Whitby, Peggy J. | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 2 |
Reports - Descriptive | 2 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Elementary Secondary Education | 2 |
Grade 10 | 1 |
Audience
Administrators | 1 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Board of Education v Rowley | 3 |
Individuals with Disabilities… | 2 |
Brown v Board of Education | 1 |
Individuals with Disabilities… | 1 |
No Child Left Behind Act 2001 | 1 |
Rodriguez v San Antonio… | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Marx, Teri A.; Hart, Jennifer L.; Nelson, Leslie; Love, Jessica; Baxter, Christine M.; Gartin, Barbara; Schaefer Whitby, Peggy J. – Intervention in School and Clinic, 2014
Two diametrically opposed beliefs are held concerning the meaning of the least restrictive environment (LRE) when determining the class placements of students with disabilities. One group adheres to the placement philosophy that the LRE is always the general education setting. The other group believes that the LRE is where the students' needs may…
Descriptors: Individualized Education Programs, Guidelines, Beliefs, Student Placement
Menard, Lauren A. – Online Submission, 2011
A contextual analysis of the general education default and student benefit is presented from the perspective of school-based compliance with federal mandates from IDEIA [Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act] of 2004. A goal was to inform school administrators striving to develop and maintain effective, inclusive learning…
Descriptors: Disabilities, Inclusion, General Education, Special Education
Bateman, David F. – TEACHING Exceptional Children, 2008
Ben is a 16-year-old student who resides with his family in an unnamed School District. He is eligible for special education by reason of specific learning disability and ADHD. His parents requested a due process hearing, alleging that the District failed to provide him with a free appropriate public education (FAPE) and requesting reimbursement…
Descriptors: Private Schools, Learning Disabilities, Public Education, Court Litigation