Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 1 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Goodness of Fit | 2 |
| Structural Equation Models | 2 |
| Factor Analysis | 1 |
| Factor Structure | 1 |
| Item Response Theory | 1 |
| Maximum Likelihood Statistics | 1 |
| Models | 1 |
| Statistical Analysis | 1 |
| Statistical Bias | 1 |
Source
| Measurement:… | 2 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Opinion Papers | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkTimothy R. Konold; Elizabeth A. Sanders – Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 2024
Compared to traditional confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM) has been shown to result in less structural parameter bias when cross-loadings (CLs) are present. However, when model fit is reasonable for CFA (over ESEM), CFA should be preferred on the basis of parsimony. Using simulations, the current…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Factor Analysis, Factor Structure, Goodness of Fit
Thissen, David – Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 2013
In this commentary, David Thissen states that "Goodness-of-fit assessment for IRT models is maturing; it has come a long way from zero." Thissen then references prior works on "goodness of fit" in the index of Lord and Novick's (1968) classic text; Yen (1984); Drasgow, Levine, Tsien, Williams, and Mead (1995); Chen and…
Descriptors: Goodness of Fit, Item Response Theory, Models, Statistical Analysis
