Publication Date
In 2025 | 1 |
Since 2024 | 8 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 9 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 9 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 21 |
Descriptor
Error of Measurement | 22 |
Goodness of Fit | 22 |
Structural Equation Models | 20 |
Computation | 10 |
Sample Size | 8 |
Simulation | 6 |
Factor Analysis | 4 |
Statistical Analysis | 4 |
Classification | 3 |
Data Analysis | 3 |
Evaluation Methods | 3 |
More ▼ |
Source
Structural Equation Modeling:… | 22 |
Author
Chunhua Cao | 3 |
Leite, Walter L. | 2 |
Xinya Liang | 2 |
Bai, Yun | 1 |
Bandalos, Deborah L. | 1 |
Bang Quan Zheng | 1 |
Benjamin Lugu | 1 |
Bentler, Peter M. | 1 |
Bovaird, James A. | 1 |
Dan Wei | 1 |
Daniel McNeish | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 22 |
Reports - Research | 15 |
Reports - Evaluative | 4 |
Reports - Descriptive | 3 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
Early Childhood Longitudinal… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Dan Wei; Peida Zhan; Hongyun Liu – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2024
In latent growth curve modeling (LGCM), overall fit indices have garnered increased disputation for model selection, and model fit evaluation based on the mean structure has becoming popularity. The present study developed a versatile fit index, named Weighted Root Mean Squared Errors (WRMSE), based on individual case residuals (ICRs) with the aim…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Goodness of Fit, Error of Measurement, Computation
Chunhua Cao; Xinya Liang – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2024
Cross-loadings are common in multiple-factor confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) but often ignored in measurement invariance testing. This study examined the impact of ignoring cross-loadings on the sensitivity of fit measures (CFI, RMSEA, SRMR, SRMRu, AIC, BIC, SaBIC, LRT) to measurement noninvariance. The manipulated design factors included the…
Descriptors: Goodness of Fit, Error of Measurement, Sample Size, Factor Analysis
Zsuzsa Bakk – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2024
A standard assumption of latent class (LC) analysis is conditional independence, that is the items of the LC are independent of the covariates given the LCs. Several approaches have been proposed for identifying violations of this assumption. The recently proposed likelihood ratio approach is compared to residual statistics (bivariate residuals…
Descriptors: Goodness of Fit, Error of Measurement, Comparative Analysis, Models
Xijuan Zhang; Hao Wu – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2024
A full structural equation model (SEM) typically consists of both a measurement model (describing relationships between latent variables and observed scale items) and a structural model (describing relationships among latent variables). However, often researchers are primarily interested in testing hypotheses related to the structural model while…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Goodness of Fit, Robustness (Statistics), Factor Structure
Chunhua Cao; Benjamin Lugu; Jujia Li – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2024
This study examined the false positive (FP) rates and sensitivity of Bayesian fit indices to structural misspecification in Bayesian structural equation modeling. The impact of measurement quality, sample size, model size, the magnitude of misspecified path effect, and the choice or prior on the performance of the fit indices was also…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Bayesian Statistics, Measurement, Error of Measurement
Daniel McNeish; Melissa G. Wolf – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2024
Despite the popularity of traditional fit index cutoffs like RMSEA [less than or equal to] 0.06 and CFI [greater than or equal to] 0.95, several studies have noted issues with overgeneralizing traditional cutoffs. Computational methods have been proposed to avoid overgeneralization by deriving cutoffs specifically tailored to the characteristics…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Cutting Scores, Generalizability Theory, Error of Measurement
Bang Quan Zheng; Peter M. Bentler – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2025
This paper aims to advocate for a balanced approach to model fit evaluation in structural equation modeling (SEM). The ongoing debate surrounding chi-square test statistics and fit indices has been characterized by ambiguity and controversy. Despite the acknowledged limitations of relying solely on the chi-square test, its careful application can…
Descriptors: Monte Carlo Methods, Structural Equation Models, Goodness of Fit, Robustness (Statistics)
Chunhua Cao; Xinya Liang – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2022
Exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM) allows for the estimation of all cross-loadings, which leads to the number of parameters estimated substantially greater than that in conventional SEM. This study examined the sensitivity of fit measures (CFI, RMSEA, AIC, BIC, SaBIC, LRT) to measurement noninvariance in ESEM. Results suggested that…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Error of Measurement, Computation, Goodness of Fit
E. Damiano D'Urso; Jesper Tijmstra; Jeroen K. Vermunt; Kim De Roover – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2024
Measurement invariance (MI) is required for validly comparing latent constructs measured by multiple ordinal self-report items. Non-invariances may occur when disregarding (group differences in) an acquiescence response style (ARS; an agreeing tendency regardless of item content). If non-invariance results solely from neglecting ARS, one should…
Descriptors: Error of Measurement, Structural Equation Models, Construct Validity, Measurement Techniques
Whittaker, Tiffany A. – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2013
Latent means methods such as multiple-indicator multiple-cause (MIMIC) and structured means modeling (SMM) allow researchers to determine whether or not a significant difference exists between groups' factor means. Strong invariance is typically recommended when interpreting latent mean differences. The extent of the impact of noninvariant…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Error of Measurement, Statistical Analysis, Goodness of Fit
Westfall, Peter H.; Henning, Kevin S. S.; Howell, Roy D. – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2012
This article shows how interfactor correlation is affected by error correlations. Theoretical and practical justifications for error correlations are given, and a new equivalence class of models is presented to explain the relationship between interfactor correlation and error correlations. The class allows simple, parsimonious modeling of error…
Descriptors: Psychometrics, Correlation, Error of Measurement, Structural Equation Models
Liu, Siwei; Rovine, Michael J.; Molenaar, Peter C. M. – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2012
This study investigated the performance of fit indexes in selecting a covariance structure for longitudinal data. Data were simulated to follow a compound symmetry, first-order autoregressive, first-order moving average, or random-coefficients covariance structure. We examined the ability of the likelihood ratio test (LRT), root mean square error…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Goodness of Fit, Longitudinal Studies, Data Analysis
Mooijaart, Ab; Bentler, Peter M. – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2010
In the last decades there has been an increasing interest in nonlinear latent variable models. Since the seminal paper of Kenny and Judd, several methods have been proposed for dealing with these kinds of models. This article introduces an alternative approach. The methodology involves fitting some third-order moments in addition to the means and…
Descriptors: Computation, Statistical Analysis, Structural Equation Models, Maximum Likelihood Statistics
Leite, Walter L.; Sandbach, Robert; Jin, Rong; MacInnes, Jann W.; Jackman, M. Grace-Anne – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2012
Because random assignment is not possible in observational studies, estimates of treatment effects might be biased due to selection on observable and unobservable variables. To strengthen causal inference in longitudinal observational studies of multiple treatments, we present 4 latent growth models for propensity score matched groups, and…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Probability, Computation, Observation
Yang-Wallentin, Fan; Joreskog, Karl G.; Luo, Hao – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2010
Ordinal variables are common in many empirical investigations in the social and behavioral sciences. Researchers often apply the maximum likelihood method to fit structural equation models to ordinal data. This assumes that the observed measures have normal distributions, which is not the case when the variables are ordinal. A better approach is…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Factor Analysis, Least Squares Statistics, Computation
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1 | 2