Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Adaptive Testing | 6 |
Error of Measurement | 6 |
Goodness of Fit | 6 |
Computer Assisted Testing | 5 |
Test Items | 4 |
Item Response Theory | 3 |
Item Analysis | 2 |
Item Banks | 2 |
Mathematical Models | 2 |
Reliability | 2 |
Test Construction | 2 |
More ▼ |
Author
Ackerman, Terry A. | 1 |
De Ayala, R. J. | 1 |
Glas, C. A. W. | 1 |
Gustafsson, Jan-Eric | 1 |
Thissen, David | 1 |
Thomas, Michael L. | 1 |
Publication Type
Reports - Research | 3 |
Journal Articles | 2 |
Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
Speeches/Meeting Papers | 2 |
Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Researchers | 1 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Thissen, David – Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 2016
David Thissen, a professor in the Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Quantitative Program at the University of North Carolina, has consulted and served on technical advisory committees for assessment programs that use item response theory (IRT) over the past couple decades. He has come to the conclusion that there are usually two purposes…
Descriptors: Item Response Theory, Test Construction, Testing Problems, Student Evaluation
Thomas, Michael L. – Assessment, 2011
Item response theory (IRT) and related latent variable models represent modern psychometric theory, the successor to classical test theory in psychological assessment. Although IRT has become prevalent in the measurement of ability and achievement, its contributions to clinical domains have been less extensive. Applications of IRT to clinical…
Descriptors: Item Response Theory, Psychological Evaluation, Reliability, Error of Measurement
Ackerman, Terry A. – 1986
The purpose of this paper is to present two new alternative methods to the current goodness of fit methodology. With the increase use of computerized adaptive test (CAT), the ability to determine the accuracy of calibrated item parameter estimates is paramount. The first method applies a normalizing transformation to the logistic residuals to make…
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Computer Simulation, Educational Research
Glas, C. A. W. – 2001
In a previous study (1998), how to evaluate whether adaptive testing data used for online calibration sufficiently fit the item response model used by C. Glas was studied. Three approaches were suggested, based on a Lagrange multiplier (LM) statistic, a Wald statistic, and a cumulative sum (CUMSUM) statistic respectively. For all these methods,…
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Error of Measurement, Estimation (Mathematics)
De Ayala, R. J.; And Others – 1991
The robustness of a partial credit (PC) model-based computerized adaptive test's (CAT's) ability estimation to items that did not fit the PC model was investigated. A CAT program was written based on the PC model. The program used maximum likelihood estimation of ability. Item selection was on the basis of information. The simulation terminated…
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Equations (Mathematics), Error of Measurement
Gustafsson, Jan-Eric – 1977
The Rasch model for test analysis is described and compared with two-parameter and three-parameter latent-trait models. Conditional maximum likelihood equations for estimating item parameters are derived, and estimates of person parameters are described together with their confidence intervals. Goodness of fit tests are discussed, including a…
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Computer Programs, Equated Scores, Error of Measurement