NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 25 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Timothy R. Konold; Elizabeth A. Sanders – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2024
Within the frequentist structural equation modeling (SEM) framework, adjudicating model quality through measures of fit has been an active area of methodological research. Complicating this conversation is research revealing that a higher quality measurement portion of a SEM can result in poorer estimates of overall model fit than lower quality…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Reliability, Bayesian Statistics, Goodness of Fit
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Mauricio Garnier-Villarreal; Terrence D. Jorgensen – Grantee Submission, 2024
Model evaluation is a crucial step in SEM, consisting of two broad areas: global and local fit, where local fit indices are use to modify the original model. In the modification process, the modification index (MI) and the standardized expected parameter change (SEPC) are used to select the parameters that can be added to improve the fit. The…
Descriptors: Bayesian Statistics, Structural Equation Models, Goodness of Fit, Indexes
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Sarah Depaoli; Sonja D. Winter; Haiyan Liu – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2024
We extended current knowledge by examining the performance of several Bayesian model fit and comparison indices through a simulation study using the confirmatory factor analysis. Our goal was to determine whether commonly implemented Bayesian indices can detect specification errors. Specifically, we wanted to uncover any differences in detecting…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Bayesian Statistics, Comparative Testing, Evaluation Utilization
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
James Ohisei Uanhoro – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2024
Accounting for model misspecification in Bayesian structural equation models is an active area of research. We present a uniquely Bayesian approach to misspecification that models the degree of misspecification as a parameter--a parameter akin to the correlation root mean squared residual. The misspecification parameter can be interpreted on its…
Descriptors: Bayesian Statistics, Structural Equation Models, Simulation, Statistical Inference
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Chunhua Cao; Benjamin Lugu; Jujia Li – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2024
This study examined the false positive (FP) rates and sensitivity of Bayesian fit indices to structural misspecification in Bayesian structural equation modeling. The impact of measurement quality, sample size, model size, the magnitude of misspecified path effect, and the choice or prior on the performance of the fit indices was also…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Bayesian Statistics, Measurement, Error of Measurement
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Haiyan Liu; Sarah Depaoli; Lydia Marvin – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2022
The deviance information criterion (DIC) is widely used to select the parsimonious, well-fitting model. We examined how priors impact model complexity (pD) and the DIC for Bayesian CFA. Study 1 compared the empirical distributions of pD and DIC under multivariate (i.e., inverse Wishart) and separation strategy (SS) priors. The former treats the…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Bayesian Statistics, Goodness of Fit, Factor Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Liang, Xinya – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2020
Bayesian structural equation modeling (BSEM) is a flexible tool for the exploration and estimation of sparse factor loading structures; that is, most cross-loading entries are zero and only a few important cross-loadings are nonzero. The current investigation was focused on the BSEM with small-variance normal distribution priors (BSEM-N) for both…
Descriptors: Factor Structure, Bayesian Statistics, Structural Equation Models, Goodness of Fit
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
De Bondt, Niki; De Maeyer, Sven; Donche, Vincent; Van Petegem, Peter – High Ability Studies, 2021
The aim of this study is to provide -- first theoretically and, subsequently, through an empirical analysis -- a rationale for including the concept of overexcitability in talent research, beyond the five-factor model personality traits. Moreover, the empirical part of this study makes use of an innovative statistical method to address the problem…
Descriptors: Personality Traits, Talent, Research, Gifted
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Önen, Emine – Universal Journal of Educational Research, 2019
This simulation study was conducted to compare the performances of Frequentist and Bayesian approaches in the context of power to detect model misspecification in terms of omitted cross-loading in CFA models with respect to the several variables (number of omitted cross-loading, magnitude of main loading, number of factors, number of indicators…
Descriptors: Factor Analysis, Bayesian Statistics, Comparative Analysis, Statistical Analysis
Cain, Meghan K.; Zhang, Zhiyong – Grantee Submission, 2018
Despite its importance to structural equation modeling, model evaluation remains underdeveloped in the Bayesian SEM framework. Posterior predictive p-values (PPP) and deviance information criteria (DIC) are now available in popular software for Bayesian model evaluation, but they remain under-utilized. This is largely due to the lack of…
Descriptors: Bayesian Statistics, Structural Equation Models, Monte Carlo Methods, Sample Size
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Levy, Roy – AERA Online Paper Repository, 2017
A conceptual distinction is drawn between indicators, which serve to define latent variables, and outcomes, which do not. However, commonly used frequentist and Bayesian estimation procedures do not honor this distinction. They allow the outcomes to influence the latent variables and the measurement model parameters for the indicators, rendering…
Descriptors: Bayesian Statistics, Structural Equation Models, Sampling, Goodness of Fit
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Sideridis, Georgios D.; Tsaousis, Ioannis; Alamri, Abeer A. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2020
The main thesis of the present study is to use the Bayesian structural equation modeling (BSEM) methodology of establishing approximate measurement invariance (A-MI) using data from a national examination in Saudi Arabia as an alternative to not meeting strong invariance criteria. Instead, we illustrate how to account for the absence of…
Descriptors: Bayesian Statistics, Structural Equation Models, Foreign Countries, Error of Measurement
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Huang, Jiajing; Liang, Xinya; Yang, Yanyun – AERA Online Paper Repository, 2017
In Bayesian structural equation modeling (BSEM), prior settings may affect model fit, parameter estimation, and model comparison. This simulation study was to investigate how the priors impact evaluation of relative fit across competing models. The design factors for data generation included sample sizes, factor structures, data distributions, and…
Descriptors: Bayesian Statistics, Structural Equation Models, Goodness of Fit, Sample Size
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Dombrowski, Stefan C.; Golay, Philippe; McGill, Ryan J.; Canivez, Gary L. – Psychology in the Schools, 2018
Bayesian structural equation modeling (BSEM) was used to investigate the latent structure of the Differential Ability Scales-Second Edition core battery using the standardization sample normative data for ages 7-17. Results revealed plausibility of a three-factor model, consistent with publisher theory, expressed as either a higher-order (HO) or a…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Bayesian Statistics, Factor Analysis, Aptitude Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Lee, Taehun; Cai, Li; Kuhfeld, Megan – Grantee Submission, 2016
Posterior Predictive Model Checking (PPMC) is a Bayesian model checking method that compares the observed data to (plausible) future observations from the posterior predictive distribution. We propose an alternative to PPMC in the context of structural equation modeling, which we term the Poor Persons PPMC (PP-PPMC), for the situation wherein one…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Bayesian Statistics, Prediction, Monte Carlo Methods
Previous Page | Next Page »
Pages: 1  |  2