Publication Date
In 2025 | 2 |
Since 2024 | 8 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 13 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 24 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 48 |
Descriptor
Error of Measurement | 57 |
Goodness of Fit | 57 |
Structural Equation Models | 57 |
Computation | 20 |
Sample Size | 17 |
Factor Analysis | 14 |
Simulation | 12 |
Statistical Analysis | 12 |
Maximum Likelihood Statistics | 10 |
Monte Carlo Methods | 10 |
Correlation | 9 |
More ▼ |
Source
Author
Cai, Li | 3 |
Chunhua Cao | 3 |
Leite, Walter L. | 2 |
Lomax, Richard G. | 2 |
Maydeu-Olivares, Alberto | 2 |
Nevitt, Jonathan | 2 |
Shi, Dexin | 2 |
Sivo, Stephen A. | 2 |
Wen, Zhonglin | 2 |
Xinya Liang | 2 |
Alamri, Abeer A. | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 50 |
Reports - Research | 38 |
Reports - Evaluative | 12 |
Reports - Descriptive | 5 |
Dissertations/Theses -… | 2 |
Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Elementary Education | 3 |
Higher Education | 2 |
Adult Basic Education | 1 |
Grade 1 | 1 |
Grade 2 | 1 |
Grade 3 | 1 |
Grade 4 | 1 |
Grade 5 | 1 |
Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Germany | 1 |
Ireland | 1 |
Saudi Arabia | 1 |
Texas | 1 |
United Arab Emirates | 1 |
United Kingdom (Northern… | 1 |
Washington | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
Program for International… | 2 |
Early Childhood Longitudinal… | 1 |
Progress in International… | 1 |
Rosenberg Self Esteem Scale | 1 |
Self Perception Profile for… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Suppanut Sriutaisuk; Yu Liu; Seungwon Chung; Hanjoe Kim; Fei Gu – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2025
The multiple imputation two-stage (MI2S) approach holds promise for evaluating the model fit of structural equation models for ordinal variables with multiply imputed data. However, previous studies only examined the performance of MI2S-based residual-based test statistics. This study extends previous research by examining the performance of two…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Error of Measurement, Programming Languages, Goodness of Fit
Dan Wei; Peida Zhan; Hongyun Liu – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2024
In latent growth curve modeling (LGCM), overall fit indices have garnered increased disputation for model selection, and model fit evaluation based on the mean structure has becoming popularity. The present study developed a versatile fit index, named Weighted Root Mean Squared Errors (WRMSE), based on individual case residuals (ICRs) with the aim…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Goodness of Fit, Error of Measurement, Computation
Chunhua Cao; Xinya Liang – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2024
Cross-loadings are common in multiple-factor confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) but often ignored in measurement invariance testing. This study examined the impact of ignoring cross-loadings on the sensitivity of fit measures (CFI, RMSEA, SRMR, SRMRu, AIC, BIC, SaBIC, LRT) to measurement noninvariance. The manipulated design factors included the…
Descriptors: Goodness of Fit, Error of Measurement, Sample Size, Factor Analysis
Xijuan Zhang; Hao Wu – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2024
A full structural equation model (SEM) typically consists of both a measurement model (describing relationships between latent variables and observed scale items) and a structural model (describing relationships among latent variables). However, often researchers are primarily interested in testing hypotheses related to the structural model while…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Goodness of Fit, Robustness (Statistics), Factor Structure
Chunhua Cao; Benjamin Lugu; Jujia Li – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2024
This study examined the false positive (FP) rates and sensitivity of Bayesian fit indices to structural misspecification in Bayesian structural equation modeling. The impact of measurement quality, sample size, model size, the magnitude of misspecified path effect, and the choice or prior on the performance of the fit indices was also…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Bayesian Statistics, Measurement, Error of Measurement
Daniel McNeish; Melissa G. Wolf – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2024
Despite the popularity of traditional fit index cutoffs like RMSEA [less than or equal to] 0.06 and CFI [greater than or equal to] 0.95, several studies have noted issues with overgeneralizing traditional cutoffs. Computational methods have been proposed to avoid overgeneralization by deriving cutoffs specifically tailored to the characteristics…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Cutting Scores, Generalizability Theory, Error of Measurement
Bang Quan Zheng; Peter M. Bentler – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2025
This paper aims to advocate for a balanced approach to model fit evaluation in structural equation modeling (SEM). The ongoing debate surrounding chi-square test statistics and fit indices has been characterized by ambiguity and controversy. Despite the acknowledged limitations of relying solely on the chi-square test, its careful application can…
Descriptors: Monte Carlo Methods, Structural Equation Models, Goodness of Fit, Robustness (Statistics)
Chunhua Cao; Xinya Liang – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2022
Exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM) allows for the estimation of all cross-loadings, which leads to the number of parameters estimated substantially greater than that in conventional SEM. This study examined the sensitivity of fit measures (CFI, RMSEA, AIC, BIC, SaBIC, LRT) to measurement noninvariance in ESEM. Results suggested that…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Error of Measurement, Computation, Goodness of Fit
E. Damiano D'Urso; Jesper Tijmstra; Jeroen K. Vermunt; Kim De Roover – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2024
Measurement invariance (MI) is required for validly comparing latent constructs measured by multiple ordinal self-report items. Non-invariances may occur when disregarding (group differences in) an acquiescence response style (ARS; an agreeing tendency regardless of item content). If non-invariance results solely from neglecting ARS, one should…
Descriptors: Error of Measurement, Structural Equation Models, Construct Validity, Measurement Techniques
Fu, Yuanshu; Wen, Zhonglin; Wang, Yang – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2022
Composite reliability, or coefficient omega, can be estimated using structural equation modeling. Composite reliability is usually estimated under the basic independent clusters model of confirmatory factor analysis (ICM-CFA). However, due to the existence of cross-loadings, the model fit of the exploratory structural equation model (ESEM) is…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Structural Equation Models, Factor Analysis, Reliability
Ke-Hai Yuan; Yong Wen; Jiashan Tang – Grantee Submission, 2022
Structural equation modeling (SEM) and path analysis using composite-scores are distinct classes of methods for modeling the relationship of theoretical constructs. The two classes of methods are integrated in the partial-least-squares approach to structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM), which systematically generates weighted composites and uses…
Descriptors: Statistical Analysis, Weighted Scores, Least Squares Statistics, Structural Equation Models
Pavlov, Goran; Maydeu-Olivares, Alberto; Shi, Dexin – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2021
We examine the accuracy of p values obtained using the asymptotic mean and variance (MV) correction to the distribution of the sample standardized root mean squared residual (SRMR) proposed by Maydeu-Olivares to assess the exact fit of SEM models. In a simulation study, we found that under normality, the MV-corrected SRMR statistic provides…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Goodness of Fit, Simulation, Error of Measurement
Jobst, Lisa J.; Auerswald, Max; Moshagen, Morten – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2022
Prior studies investigating the effects of non-normality in structural equation modeling typically induced non-normality in the indicator variables. This procedure neglects the factor analytic structure of the data, which is defined as the sum of latent variables and errors, so it is unclear whether previous results hold if the source of…
Descriptors: Goodness of Fit, Structural Equation Models, Error of Measurement, Factor Analysis
Mansolf, Maxwell; Jorgensen, Terrence D.; Enders, Craig K. – Grantee Submission, 2020
Structural equation modeling (SEM) applications routinely employ a trilogy of significance tests that includes the likelihood ratio test, Wald test, and score test or modification index. Researchers use these tests to assess global model fit, evaluate whether individual estimates differ from zero, and identify potential sources of local misfit,…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Computation, Scores, Simulation
Shi, Dexin; Maydeu-Olivares, Alberto – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2020
We examined the effect of estimation methods, maximum likelihood (ML), unweighted least squares (ULS), and diagonally weighted least squares (DWLS), on three population SEM (structural equation modeling) fit indices: the root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA), the comparative fit index (CFI), and the standardized root mean square residual…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Computation, Maximum Likelihood Statistics, Least Squares Statistics