Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 2 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 5 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 5 |
Descriptor
Computer Assisted Testing | 5 |
Grade 2 | 5 |
Grade 3 | 5 |
Grade 4 | 5 |
Oral Reading | 5 |
Reading Fluency | 5 |
Curriculum Based Assessment | 4 |
Reading Tests | 4 |
Scores | 4 |
Elementary School Students | 3 |
Predictor Variables | 3 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Reports - Research | 4 |
Journal Articles | 2 |
Dissertations/Theses -… | 1 |
Numerical/Quantitative Data | 1 |
Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Tests/Questionnaires | 1 |
Education Level
Early Childhood Education | 5 |
Elementary Education | 5 |
Grade 2 | 5 |
Grade 3 | 5 |
Grade 4 | 5 |
Intermediate Grades | 5 |
Primary Education | 5 |
Grade 5 | 1 |
Middle Schools | 1 |
Audience
Location
Oregon | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
Flesch Kincaid Grade Level… | 1 |
easyCBM | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Nese, Joseph F. T. – AERA Open, 2022
Curriculum-based measurement of oral reading fluency (CBM-R) is used as an indicator of reading proficiency, and to measure at risk students' response to reading interventions to help ensure effective instruction. The purpose of this study was to compare model-based words read correctly per minute (WCPM) scores (computerized oral reading…
Descriptors: Reading Tests, Oral Reading, Reading Fluency, Curriculum Based Assessment
Nese, Joseph F. T. – Grantee Submission, 2022
Curriculum-based measurement of oral reading fluency (CBM-R) is used as an indicator of reading proficiency, and to measure at risk students' response to reading interventions to help ensure effective instruction. The purpose of this study was to compare model-based words read correctly per minute (WCPM) scores (computerized oral reading…
Descriptors: Reading Tests, Oral Reading, Reading Fluency, Curriculum Based Assessment
Nese, Joseph F. T.; Kahn, Josh; Kamata, Akihito – Grantee Submission, 2017
Despite prevalent use and practical application, the current and standard assessment of oral reading fluency (ORF) presents considerable limitations which reduces its validity in estimating growth and monitoring student progress, including: (a) high cost of implementation; (b) tenuous passage equivalence; and (c) bias, large standard error, and…
Descriptors: Automation, Speech, Recognition (Psychology), Scores
Kahn, Josh; Nese, Joseph T.; Alonzo, Julie – Behavioral Research and Teaching, 2016
There is strong theoretical support for oral reading fluency (ORF) as an essential building block of reading proficiency. The current and standard ORF assessment procedure requires that students read aloud a grade-level passage (˜ 250 words) in a one-to-one administration, with the number of words read correctly in 60 seconds constituting their…
Descriptors: Teacher Surveys, Oral Reading, Reading Tests, Computer Assisted Testing
Perry, Paul J. – ProQuest LLC, 2016
Recent legislation such as No Child Left Behind and the Performance Evaluation Reform Act (PERA) increasingly pressure teachers and schools to be accountable for instructional time in the form of improved test scores. As a result, students are given an increasing variety of assessments in a given school year in an attempt to measure academic…
Descriptors: Predictive Validity, Oral Reading, Reading Fluency, Informal Reading Inventories