Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 1 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Computer Assisted Testing | 2 |
Data Collection | 2 |
Grade 4 | 2 |
Growth Models | 2 |
Progress Monitoring | 2 |
Accuracy | 1 |
Achievement Gains | 1 |
Adaptive Testing | 1 |
At Risk Students | 1 |
Bayesian Statistics | 1 |
Comparative Analysis | 1 |
More ▼ |
Author
Emily R. Forcht | 1 |
Ethan R. Van Norman | 1 |
Klingbeil, Dave A. | 1 |
Nelson, Peter M. | 1 |
Parker, David C. | 1 |
Van Norman, Ethan R. | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 2 |
Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
Elementary Education | 2 |
Grade 4 | 2 |
Intermediate Grades | 2 |
Middle Schools | 2 |
Grade 5 | 1 |
Grade 6 | 1 |
Grade 8 | 1 |
Junior High Schools | 1 |
Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Ethan R. Van Norman; Emily R. Forcht – Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 2024
This study evaluated the forecasting accuracy of trend estimation methods applied to time-series data from computer adaptive tests (CATs). Data were collected roughly once a month over the course of a school year. We evaluated the forecasting accuracy of two regression-based growth estimation methods (ordinary least squares and Theil-Sen). The…
Descriptors: Data Collection, Predictive Measurement, Predictive Validity, Predictor Variables
Nelson, Peter M.; Van Norman, Ethan R.; Klingbeil, Dave A.; Parker, David C. – Psychology in the Schools, 2017
Although extensive research exists on the use of curriculum-based measures for progress monitoring, little is known about using computer adaptive tests (CATs) for progress-monitoring purposes. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of the frequency of data collection on individual and group growth estimates using a CAT. Data were…
Descriptors: Progress Monitoring, Computer Assisted Testing, Data Collection, Scheduling