Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 3 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 9 |
Descriptor
Source
Educational Leadership | 3 |
Online Submission | 2 |
Educational Assessment,… | 1 |
Phi Delta Kappan | 1 |
Principal Leadership | 1 |
Theory Into Practice | 1 |
Author
Jung, Lee Ann | 9 |
Guskey, Thomas R. | 7 |
O'Connor, Ken | 1 |
Reeves, Douglas | 1 |
Swan, Gerry M. | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 7 |
Reports - Descriptive | 5 |
Reports - Evaluative | 3 |
Speeches/Meeting Papers | 2 |
Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Elementary Secondary Education | 3 |
High Schools | 1 |
Audience
Teachers | 2 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Individuals with Disabilities… | 2 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Jung, Lee Ann – Educational Leadership, 2020
Most educators agree that students' academic grades should be kept separate from measures of organization, engagement, or timeliness. But how do we move toward the goal of all students' being engaged in learning, giving effort, and being conscientious about deadlines without attaching those behaviors to a grade? This seems to be the million-dollar…
Descriptors: Grades (Scholastic), Grading, Learner Engagement, Student Participation
O'Connor, Ken; Jung, Lee Ann; Reeves, Douglas – Phi Delta Kappan, 2018
The authors posit that the traditional grading system involving points and percentages is not the best way to prepare students to be the self-directed, independent learners they need to be. A better system would produce grades that are FAST (fair, accurate, specific, timely). To bring about these changes, school leaders need not create full…
Descriptors: Grading, Skill Development, Study Skills, Grades (Scholastic)
Guskey, Thomas R.; Jung, Lee Ann – Educational Leadership, 2016
Many educators consider grades calculated from statistical algorithms more accurate, objective, and reliable than grades they calculate themselves. But in this research, the authors first asked teachers to use their professional judgment to choose a summary grade for hypothetical students. When the researchers compared the teachers' grade with the…
Descriptors: Grading, Computer Assisted Testing, Interrater Reliability, Grades (Scholastic)
Swan, Gerry M.; Guskey, Thomas R.; Jung, Lee Ann – Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 2014
The purpose of this study was to determine parents' and teachers' perceptions of standards-based and traditional report cards. Participants included 115 parents/guardians of students from a single, midsize school district that had implemented a standards-based report card. During the first two marking periods, all parents/guardians received both a…
Descriptors: Parent Attitudes, Teacher Attitudes, Report Cards, Academic Standards
Guskey, Thomas R.; Jung, Lee Ann – Principal Leadership, 2012
The field of education is moving rapidly toward a standards-based approach to grading. School leaders have become increasingly aware of the tremendous variation that exists in grading practices, even among teachers of the same courses in the same department in the same school. Consequently, students' grades often have little relation to their…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Grades (Scholastic), Class Rank, Grading
Jung, Lee Ann; Guskey, Thomas R. – Educational Leadership, 2010
Teachers often grapple with the challenge of giving report card grades to students with learning disabilities and English language learners. The authors offer a five-step model that "offers a fair, accurate, and legal way to adapt the grading process for exceptional learners." The model begins with a high-quality reporting system for all students…
Descriptors: Report Cards, Student Needs, Grades (Scholastic), Learning Disabilities
Grading and Reporting in a Standards-Based Environment: Implications for Students with Special Needs
Jung, Lee Ann; Guskey, Thomas R. – Online Submission, 2009
Teachers at all levels of education today struggle in their efforts to assign fair, accurate, and meaningful grades to students with disabilities, especially those placed in general education classrooms. Lacking specific policies or recommendations, most teachers apply informal, individual grading adaptations for such students. Although these…
Descriptors: Grades (Scholastic), Grading, Special Needs Students, Disabilities
Grading and Reporting in a Standards-Based Environment: Implications for Students with Special Needs
Guskey, Thomas R.; Jung, Lee Ann – Theory Into Practice, 2009
Teachers at all levels of education today struggle in their efforts to assign fair, accurate, and meaningful grades to students with disabilities, especially those placed in general education classrooms. Lacking specific policies or recommendations, most teachers apply informal, individual grading adaptations for such students. Although these…
Descriptors: Grades (Scholastic), Disabilities, Classroom Environment, Special Needs Students
Jung, Lee Ann; Guskey, Thomas R. – Online Submission, 2007
Grades, report cards, and other progress reports are important vehicles for communicating with families about their children's strengths, areas to target, and interventions that can be used at home. For families of children with disabilities, accurate information on learning progress is essential for understanding intervention effectiveness and…
Descriptors: Special Needs Students, Disabilities, Report Cards, Placement