NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 42 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Derek Hopper; Neil Bowen – rEFLections, 2023
Many writing teachers believe that giving written corrective feedback (WCF) is an important part of learning to write. Equally, students like to receive it. However, most previous research on WCF has looked at its overall effectiveness, with less attention paid to the differences of opinion between students and their teachers, and the implications…
Descriptors: Student Attitudes, Teacher Attitudes, Feedback (Response), Writing Instruction
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Kim, YouJin; Choi, Bumyong; Yun, Hyunae; Kim, Binna; Choi, Sujeong – Language Teaching Research, 2022
Recently, there has been a shift in the perception of tasks. Tasks are no longer viewed as 'one-off' activities, and the importance of studying the role of task repetition has been increasingly addressed (Bygate, 2018). However, the way task repetition effects are mediated by other instructional conditions such as corrective feedback has not been…
Descriptors: Repetition, Synchronous Communication, Written Language, Error Correction
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Hailay Tesfay Gebremariam – SAGE Open, 2024
Although, written corrective feedback (hereafter referred to as CF) is applauded in many writing courses for fostering students' quality writing, its impact on grammatical accuracy in L2 students' writing remains a debated topic. Thus, this study looked into the effect of CF types on L2 students' grammatical accuracy in writing. To achieve this…
Descriptors: Outcomes of Education, Written Language, Feedback (Response), Error Correction
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Mahmood, Rizgar Qasim; Aziz, Muhammad Abdulwahab – Language Teaching Research Quarterly, 2023
The research on English as a Foreign Language (EFL) writing has garnered considerable attention over the years, particularly concerning the impact of corrective feedback (CF) on students' errors. However, in the context of Kurdish EFL students, this area of research has received limited attention, despite its potential to enhance their grammatical…
Descriptors: Direct Instruction, Written Language, Error Correction, Feedback (Response)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Santanatanon, Thanakorn; Chinokul, Sumalee – PASAA: Journal of Language Teaching and Learning in Thailand, 2022
Whether students benefit from written corrective feedback (WCF) may depend on their level of engagement with the feedback. To date, student engagement with written corrective feedback has been investigated qualitatively. However, the association between student engagement with feedback and learning outcomes that result from that engagement has not…
Descriptors: Learner Engagement, English (Second Language), Writing Skills, Grammar
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
McLellan, Gerry – Language Teaching, 2021
In her article, Icy Lee (2019, pp. 524-536) discusses the differences between comprehensive written corrective feedback (CWCF) and focused written corrective feedback (FWCF). She argues that teachers should concentrate more on focused feedback, and highlight and correct only a few grammar errors or issues with organisation, for example, instead of…
Descriptors: Written Language, Feedback (Response), Teaching Methods, Error Correction
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Kiliçkaya, Ferit – Computer Assisted Language Learning, 2022
Although a plethora of research has been conducted on written corrective feedback and timing of feedback in various teaching and learning contexts, there is a paucity of research on learners' preferences regarding different online written corrective feedback. Such a lacuna becomes prominent in EFL contexts, especially in grammar classes, where…
Descriptors: Preservice Teachers, Language Teachers, Electronic Learning, Written Language
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Eckstein, Grant; Sims, Maureen; Rohm, Lisa – TESL Canada Journal, 2020
Dynamic written corrective feedback (DWCF) is a pedagogical approach that offers meaningful, manageable, constant, and timely corrective feedback on student writing (Hartshorn et al., 2010). It emphasizes indirect and comprehensive written error correction on short, daily writing assignments. Numerous studies have demonstrated that its use can…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Written Language, Error Correction, Time Factors (Learning)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Mike Metz; Matthew J. Gordon; Thanh P. Nguyen – Reading Horizons, 2024
This article explores patterns in teachers' reported correction of student language use in speech and writing. The authors use the concept of language correction in student writing and student speech as a proxy for prescriptive approaches to teaching about language. By conducting a large-scale survey of all language and literacy teachers from…
Descriptors: Error Correction, Elementary Secondary Education, Teacher Attitudes, Speech Communication
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Fields, R. Stacy; Elleman, Amy M.; Oslund, Eric L.; Clark, Laura B.; Olson, Collin – Reading Psychology, 2023
Writing is a skill that has increased in significance for both researchers and classroom teachers due to changes in recent standards. Currently, many high school English Learners (ELs) are struggling to master this priority skill. A strategy that has been shown to be effective for adolescent writers is Self-Regulated Strategy Development (SRSD).…
Descriptors: High School Students, English Language Learners, Writing Skills, Writing Strategies
Hyunjung An – ProQuest LLC, 2020
The main purpose of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of written corrective feedback (WCF) in a Korean as a foreign language (KFL) context. The assumption that indirect feedback (IF) is more effective for L2 learners with higher-proficiency levels has yet to be fully corroborated, which necessitates substantial research-based…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Written Language, Error Correction, Korean
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Suh, Bo-Ram – Language Teaching Research, 2023
The use of concurrent data elicitation procedures (e.g. think-alouds, eye-tracking, response time) to investigate learners' cognitive processing and processes is becoming more prominent in research designs as researchers seek to acquire a better understanding of how second language (L2) learners process L2 data (e.g. Martin et al., 2019; Rogers,…
Descriptors: Protocol Analysis, Feedback (Response), Second Language Learning, Second Language Instruction
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Mifka-Profozic, Nadia; Behney, Jennifer; Gass, Susan M.; Macis, Marijana; Chiuchiù, Gaia; Bovolenta, Giulia – Language Learning, 2023
We conducted a multisite replication of Yang and Lyster's (2010) study investigating the effects of recasts and prompts on learning English regular and irregular past tense. Our study was conducted with intact high school and vocational school classes in Italy and Bosnia. Our participants were young adolescents (14-15 and 16-17 years old), a…
Descriptors: Grammar, Second Language Learning, Second Language Instruction, English (Second Language)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Abalkheel, Albatool; Brandenburg, Tara – English Language Teaching, 2020
Many language teachers spend countless hours correcting student writing in hopes of improvement in accuracy, but as of yet, there has been little consensus regarding the efficacy of written corrective feedback (CF) or the type of CF that is most efficient. Although many studies have been conducted on the topic, conflicting results have arisen. In…
Descriptors: Error Correction, Written Language, Feedback (Response), Educational Research
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Khodadadi, Soulmaz – Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 2021
Learning to write correctly, besides the learning of fluent speaking a foreign language, as two important productive skills had been under a great attention from the beginning of the research over the English language teaching and learning. Errors and mistakes, as inevitable parts of learning a 2nd/FL have also paid much attention, though…
Descriptors: Instructional Effectiveness, Direct Instruction, English (Second Language), Second Language Instruction
Previous Page | Next Page »
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3