Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 3 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 4 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 6 |
Descriptor
Source
Journal of Language and… | 1 |
Journal of Research in… | 1 |
Language Awareness | 1 |
Language Learning & Technology | 1 |
Language Teaching Research | 1 |
Modern Language Journal | 1 |
Reading Matrix: An… | 1 |
Author
Gholami, Leila | 3 |
Edasawa, Yasuyo | 1 |
Gholami, Javad | 1 |
Hasan, Md. Kamrul | 1 |
Hossain, Md. Didar | 1 |
Kabata, Kaori | 1 |
Kassin, Saul M. | 1 |
Reber, Arthur S. | 1 |
Watts, Mary L. | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 7 |
Reports - Research | 7 |
Tests/Questionnaires | 3 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 2 |
Adult Education | 1 |
Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Iran | 2 |
Bangladesh | 1 |
Canada | 1 |
Japan | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Gholami, Leila; Gholami, Javad – Language Teaching Research, 2020
An extensive number of studies have examined the effectiveness of incidental focus on form (FonF) measured through uptake in primarily communicative activities and established an association between learners' uptake of linguistic features and their subsequent second language development. In this strand of research, the analysis of linguistic forms…
Descriptors: Advanced Courses, Second Language Learning, Second Language Instruction, English (Second Language)
Gholami, Leila – Modern Language Journal, 2022
Focus on form (FonF) studies have predominantly addressed its effectiveness in improving learners' syntactic, lexical, orthographic, and phonological knowledge. Extending the scope of this line of research to formulaic FonF practices, this study investigates the relative effectiveness of incidental FonF targeting formulaic versus nonformulaic…
Descriptors: Phrase Structure, Grammar, Second Language Learning, Second Language Instruction
Hossain, Md. Didar; Hasan, Md. Kamrul – Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 2022
Vocabulary knowledge is very crucial for learners who want to be competent in a language. Vocabulary knowledge means having the knowledge of or command over words of a language and their usages in real-life contexts. Vocabulary knowledge can be gained incidentally and intentionally. The paper compares the effectiveness of the reading-only…
Descriptors: Incidental Learning, Vocabulary Development, Reading Processes, Listening Comprehension
Gholami, Leila – Language Awareness, 2022
Research on corrective feedback (CF) and language teachers' beliefs and practices on the provision of CF has been mainly limited to learners' non-target-like use of grammar, vocabulary, pronunciation, and spelling (non-formulaic forms). Consequently, learners' non-target-like use of formulaic sequences, that is, collocations, idioms, lexical…
Descriptors: Phrase Structure, Grammar, Teacher Attitudes, Figurative Language
Kabata, Kaori; Edasawa, Yasuyo – Language Learning & Technology, 2011
Patterns of students' language learning were examined through an asynchronous cross-cultural bilingual communication project conducted between Japanese university students learning English and Canadian university students learning Japanese. Previous studies on cross-cultural communication projects have reported positive outcomes in providing…
Descriptors: Incidental Learning, English (Second Language), Intercultural Communication, Computer Mediated Communication
Watts, Mary L. – Reading Matrix: An International Online Journal, 2008
The present study investigated the relationship between L2 incidental lexical gain during reading and the variables of clause type and word saliency. Lexical gain was defined as gain of grammatical class and word meaning and was compared for target items in dependent and independent clauses. Word saliency was a measurement of the learners'…
Descriptors: Phrase Structure, Second Language Learning, Correlation, Incidental Learning

Kassin, Saul M.; Reber, Arthur S. – Journal of Research in Personality, 1979
Subjects with internal or external locus of control were instructed to remeber as much as possible from an array of letter strings generated from a finite state grammar. While both groups attended to the exemplars, internals extracted more invariance and hence learned more about the underlying grammatical structure. (Author/SJL)
Descriptors: Cognitive Style, College Students, Grammar, Incidental Learning