NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing all 13 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Taichi Yamashita – Computer Assisted Language Learning, 2024
The present paper reports on the effectiveness and inclusiveness of human-delivered synchronous written corrective feedback (SWCF) in paired writing tasks. Replicating Yamashita, Study 2 and Study 3 each conducted a classroom-based quasi-experimental study in an English-as-a-Second-Language (ESL) writing program at an American university. In Study…
Descriptors: Synchronous Communication, Feedback (Response), Student Evaluation, Written Language
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Tang, Gladys; Li, Qun; Li, Jia; Yiu, Chris K.-M. – American Annals of the Deaf, 2023
The literacy development of d/Deaf and hard of hearing (d/Dhh) children has always been a matter of grave concern among educators, and grammatical knowledge is said to constitute a major component such development. The present article reports on a study that examined the development of Chinese grammar among groups of d/Dhh and hearing children who…
Descriptors: Chinese, Grammar, Deafness, Hearing Impairments
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Lee, Icy – Language Teaching, 2019
In different parts of the world second language (L2) teachers devote a massive amount of time to giving feedback on grammatical errors in student writing. Such written corrective feedback, which is unfocused and comprehensive, is fraught with problems for both teachers and students. Nonetheless, it remains a prevalent practice in many L2 contexts.…
Descriptors: Second Language Instruction, Language Teachers, Student Evaluation, Feedback (Response)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Kilpatrick, Jennifer Renée; Wolbers, Kimberly A. – Psychology in the Schools, 2020
Deaf students often differ from their hearing peers in written language development. Providing developmentally appropriate instruction is ideal, yet current methods of writing assessment do not provide teachers with sufficient information regarding the written language (i.e., syntactic) development of deaf students. In this research, we use a…
Descriptors: Grammar, Written Language, Deafness, Students with Disabilities
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Uchihara, Takumi; Webb, Stuart; Saito, Kazuya; Trofimovich, Pavel – Modern Language Journal, 2022
This study examined how mode of input affects the learning of pronunciation and form-meaning connection of second language (L2) words. Seventy-five Japanese learners of English were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 conditions (reading while listening, reading only, listening only), studied 40 low-frequency words while viewing their corresponding…
Descriptors: Linguistic Input, English (Second Language), Second Language Learning, Second Language Instruction
Kilpatrick, Jennifer Renée; Wolbers, Kimberly A. – Grantee Submission, 2019
Deaf students often differ from their hearing peers in written language development. Providing developmentally appropriate instruction is ideal, yet current methods of writing assessment do not provide teachers with sufficient information regarding the written language (i.e., syntactic) development of deaf students. In this research, we use a…
Descriptors: Grammar, Written Language, Deafness, Students with Disabilities
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Balanga, Roselle A.; Fidel, Irish Van B.; Gumapac, Mone Virma Ginry P.; Ho, Howell T.; Tullo, Riza Mae C.; Villaraza, Patricia Monette L.; Vizconde, Camilla J. – Journal on English Language Teaching, 2016
The study identified the beliefs of high school students toward Written Corrective Feedback (WCF), based on the framework of Anderson (2010). It also investigated the most common errors that students commit in writing stories and the type of WCF students receive from teachers. Data in the form of stories which were checked by teachers were…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, High School Students, Student Attitudes, Beliefs
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Meng, Yuan-Yuan – Working Papers in TESOL & Applied Linguistics, 2013
Linguistic errors are pervasive in second language (L2) students' writing. Depending on their gravity, the errors may cause a minor degree of irritation to the reader or even lead to total communication breakdown. As such, errors have always been a major concern to both students and teachers, and error correction has also assumed a central…
Descriptors: Written Language, Error Correction, Feedback (Response), Second Language Instruction
Gutschow, Harald – Englisch, 1973
Descriptors: English (Second Language), Error Patterns, Grammar, Language Instruction
Kamiyama, Tamie – Journal of the Association of Teachers of Japanese, 1974
Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages, November 1971, Chicago, Illinois. (DD)
Descriptors: Grammar, Japanese, Language Ability, Language Instruction
Frisof, Kenneth B.; Moseley, James L. – 1982
The prevalence of writing errors made by third-year medical students from the class of 1981 at a large midwestern medical school was studied. The papers of 253 students taking family medicine were evaluated for spelling, grammar, and punctuation errors. Four types of grammar errors and seven punctuation errors were analyzed, and each word…
Descriptors: Descriptive Writing, Error Analysis (Language), Grammar, Higher Education
Sheppard, Ken – RELC Journal: A Journal of Language Teaching and Research in Southeast Asia, 1992
The effects of two distinct ways of responding to a student essay (discrete-item attention to form and holistic feedback on meaning) were compared for a linguistically diverse group of 26 first-year college students. Findings suggest that the holistic response is likely to result in improvements in grammatical accuracy. (19 references) (Author/LB)
Descriptors: College Students, Comparative Analysis, Essays, Feedback
Kelly, Eileen; And Others – 1994
This paper discusses the development of a criterion-referenced assessment measure for both written English and American Sign Language (ASL) that can be used with deaf elementary through secondary students. The measure is presented as well as the results of a trial use. Developed by the Cleary School for the Deaf, the Cleary Language Assessment…
Descriptors: American Sign Language, Check Lists, Criterion Referenced Tests, Deafness