Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Data Interpretation | 2 |
| Effect Size | 2 |
| Graphs | 2 |
| Statistical Analysis | 2 |
| College Faculty | 1 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Computation | 1 |
| Computer Software | 1 |
| Correlation | 1 |
| Doctoral Programs | 1 |
| Educational Psychology | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Brossart, Daniel F. | 1 |
| Mahadevan, Lakshmi | 1 |
| Olson, Elizabeth A. | 1 |
| Parker, Richard I. | 1 |
| Schild, Anne H. E. | 1 |
| Voracek, Martin | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkSchild, Anne H. E.; Voracek, Martin – Research Synthesis Methods, 2015
Research has shown that forest plots are a gold standard in the visualization of meta-analytic results. However, research on the general interpretation of forest plots and the role of researchers' meta-analysis experience and field of study is still unavailable. Additionally, the traditional display of effect sizes, confidence intervals, and…
Descriptors: Graphs, Visualization, Meta Analysis, Data Interpretation
Brossart, Daniel F.; Parker, Richard I.; Olson, Elizabeth A.; Mahadevan, Lakshmi – Behavior Modification, 2006
This study explored some practical issues for single-case researchers who rely on visual analysis of graphed data, but who also may consider supplemental use of promising statistical analysis techniques. The study sought to answer three major questions: (a) What is a typical range of effect sizes from these analytic techniques for data from…
Descriptors: Research Design, Effect Size, Evaluation Methods, Researchers
