Publication Date
In 2025 | 1 |
Since 2024 | 1 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 3 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 4 |
Descriptor
Engineering Education | 4 |
Group Dynamics | 4 |
Teamwork | 4 |
Undergraduate Students | 3 |
College Faculty | 2 |
Comparative Analysis | 2 |
Student Attitudes | 2 |
Academic Achievement | 1 |
Academic Advising | 1 |
Attitude Change | 1 |
Barriers | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Advances in Engineering… | 4 |
Author
Brown, Matthew J. | 1 |
Cerasela Zoica Dinu | 1 |
Dahm, Kevin | 1 |
Fairchild, Joshua | 1 |
Gans, Nicholas | 1 |
Grohman, Magdalena G. | 1 |
Harvey, Roberta | 1 |
Julie A. Lockman | 1 |
Lee, Eun Ah | 1 |
Newell, Heidi | 1 |
Newell, James | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 4 |
Reports - Research | 4 |
Tests/Questionnaires | 2 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 4 |
Postsecondary Education | 3 |
Audience
Location
Pennsylvania | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Julie A. Lockman; Cerasela Zoica Dinu – Advances in Engineering Education, 2025
This paper explores the impact of sessions with sophomore biomedical engineering students at an R1 university focused on individualized talent discovery and development to create effective teams of contributing individuals and future professionals. The rationale was that the identification and exploration of individual strengths early in the…
Descriptors: Undergraduate Study, Biomedicine, Engineering Education, Undergraduate Students
Grohman, Magdalena G.; Gans, Nicholas; Lee, Eun Ah; Tacca, Marco; Brown, Matthew J. – Advances in Engineering Education, 2020
Engineering ethics education typically focuses on decisions by individual engineers and case studies of disasters. This does not reflect the everyday decisions that practicing engineers must make, and neglects the fact that most engineers work on teams rather than alone. The focus on safety and disaster prevention leaves little time for discussing…
Descriptors: Ethics, Engineering Education, Decision Making, Safety
Solnosky, Ryan; Fairchild, Joshua – Advances in Engineering Education, 2017
Many engineering faculty have limited skills and/or assessment tools to evaluate team dynamics in multidisciplinary team-based capstone courses. Rapidly deployable tools are needed here to provide proactive feedback to teams to facilitate deeper learning. Two surveys were developed based on industrial and organizational psychology theories around…
Descriptors: Curriculum, Surveys, Engineering, Engineering Education
Dahm, Kevin; Newell, James; Newell, Heidi; Harvey, Roberta – Advances in Engineering Education, 2009
This paper discusses efforts to develop metacognition in teams of engineering students by: first, exploring personal learning patterns, and second, ongoing biweekly journaling exercises. Thirty-three junior and senior engineering students (30 chemical engineer, one each from mechanical, civil and electrical) working on semester-long projects in…
Descriptors: Metacognition, Engineering Education, College Faculty, Academic Advising