Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 1 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
Computer Assisted Instruction | 3 |
Group Dynamics | 3 |
Heterogeneous Grouping | 3 |
Homogeneous Grouping | 3 |
Cooperative Learning | 2 |
Group Activities | 2 |
Junior High Schools | 2 |
Academic Achievement | 1 |
Algorithms | 1 |
Analysis of Variance | 1 |
Aptitude Treatment Interaction | 1 |
More ▼ |
Author
Brendan Flanagan | 1 |
Changhao Liang | 1 |
Hannafin, Michael J. | 1 |
Hiroaki Ogata | 1 |
Hooper, Simon | 1 |
Rwitajit Majumdar | 1 |
Underwood, Geoffrey | 1 |
Yuta Nakamizo | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Reports - Research | 3 |
Education Level
Junior High Schools | 1 |
Middle Schools | 1 |
Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Practitioners | 1 |
Location
Japan | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Changhao Liang; Rwitajit Majumdar; Yuta Nakamizo; Brendan Flanagan; Hiroaki Ogata – Interactive Learning Environments, 2024
In-class group work activities are found to promote the interpersonal skills of learners. To support the teachers in facilitating such activities, we designed a learning analytics-enhanced technology framework, Group Learning Orchestration Based on Evidence (GLOBE) using data-driven approaches. In this study, we implemented the algorithmic group…
Descriptors: Algorithms, Group Dynamics, Group Activities, Learning Analytics

Underwood, Geoffrey; And Others – Educational Research, 1990
Four measures of performance of three types of pairings (boy/boy, girl/girl, girl/boy) involved in completion of a language task on microcomputers gave consistent results. Single-gender pairs improved in comparison with individuals working alone but mixed-gender pairs did not. Single-gender pairs tended to share task and discuss solutions, whereas…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Instruction, Cooperative Learning, Elementary Education, Group Dynamics

Hooper, Simon; Hannafin, Michael J. – Journal of Educational Computing Research, 1988
Describes study that compared the achievement of high and low ability eighth-grade students working cooperatively during computer-based instruction. Homogeneous and heterogeneous grouping based on ability are explained, posttest results are analyzed, and implications for instructional design are discussed. (23 references) (Author/LRW)
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Analysis of Variance, Aptitude Treatment Interaction, Comparative Analysis