Descriptor
Group Dynamics | 12 |
Interaction Process Analysis | 12 |
Measurement Instruments | 12 |
Classification | 6 |
Research Projects | 5 |
Therapy | 4 |
Conceptual Schemes | 3 |
Graduate Students | 3 |
Rating Scales | 3 |
Sensitivity Training | 3 |
Bibliographies | 2 |
More ▼ |
Author
Conyne, Robert K. | 2 |
Rapin, Lynn S. | 2 |
Gibson, Dennis L. | 1 |
Hill, W. Fawcett | 1 |
Hill, William Fawcett | 1 |
Matheson, W. | 1 |
Park, James | 1 |
Portal-Foster, Charles… | 1 |
Powell, Evan R. | 1 |
Silbergeld, Sam | 1 |
Sisson, C. J. | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Gibson, Dennis L. – 1970
The Hill Interaction Matrix-G (HIM-G), a 72 item questionnaire, is a shorter method for the analysis of verbal interaction in small groups. Intended as a substitute for the more precise Hill Interaction Matrix Rating System (HIM-SS) this version can be rated within twenty minutes after observation of the group. A Fortran computer scoring program…
Descriptors: Group Dynamics, Group Therapy, Interaction Process Analysis, Measurement Instruments

Powell, Evan R. – Small Group Behavior, 1977
This study uses two methods of analysis to examine the degree to which items within the cells of the Hill Interaction Matrix correlate. It is found that the table of specifications does not hold up. But the author recommends caution in interpreting this finding. (Author/BP)
Descriptors: Classification, Conceptual Schemes, Correlation, Evaluation Criteria

Hill, William Fawcett – Personnel and Guidance Journal, 1971
Leadership style, group composition, and group development are simultaneously quantified through the use of the matrix. It represents an attempt to objectify the art of group therapy. Comment by Richard C. Rank follows. (Author)
Descriptors: Behavior Patterns, Classification, Feedback, Group Behavior

Hill, W. Fawcett – Small Group Behavior, 1977
Essentially, the HIM is a systematic set of categories developed for use in understanding and classifying interaction in small groups, especially therapy groups. It has, however, been used not only on T-groups, encounter groups, discussion groups, and such, but also on individual and dyadic counseling sessions. (Author)
Descriptors: Bibliographies, Classification, Conceptual Schemes, Group Dynamics

Matheson, W. – Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 1972
Responses to Bales' Interpersonal Ratings Questionnaire were analyzed in an attempt to validate the concepts of three-dimensional space as descriptive of individual performance in small groups. (Author)
Descriptors: Group Dynamics, Interaction Process Analysis, Interpersonal Relationship, Measurement Instruments

Uhlemann, Max R.; Weigel, Richard G. – Small Group Behavior, 1977
This study evaluated behavior change occurring after a marathon group experience, with a focus on individualized rather than shared behavioral change criteria. The individualization of behavior change criteria is based on the assertion that few, if any, single change criteria are appropriate or realistic for assessing change in all individuals.…
Descriptors: Behavior Change, Classification, College Students, Evaluation Criteria

Silbergeld, Sam; And Others – Small Group Behavior, 1977
To assess two group models being developed in the Mental Health Study Center, NIMH, this paper compares HIM data from these models with norms from a previous study. By contrasting HIM results from groups of married couples, young adolescents, and parents and teachers, one obtains a better understanding of the effectiveness of these models. (Author)
Descriptors: Classification, Comparative Analysis, Evaluation Methods, Group Dynamics

Conyne, Robert K.; Rapin, Lynn S. – Small Group Behavior, 1977
This study compared the effectiveness of facilitator-directed and self-directed personal growth group treatments toward inducing therapeutic verbal interaction. An interaction process analysis approach, the Hill Interaction Matrix (HIM) statement-by-statement system, was used to examine treatment differences. (Author)
Descriptors: Graduate Students, Group Dynamics, Interaction Process Analysis, Leadership Styles

Conyne, Robert K.; Rapin, Lynn S. – Small Group Behavior, 1977
This study of group process evaluated the relative effectiveness of facilitator-directed (FD) and self-directed (SD) personal growth group treatments in inducing change in the level of group member interaction. Examination of treatment effectiveness was accomplished through an interaction process analysis approach, the Hill Interaction…
Descriptors: Formative Evaluation, Graduate Students, Group Dynamics, Individual Development

Sisson, C. J.; And Others – Small Group Behavior, 1977
The purpose of this investigation is to compare the descriptions of group process obtained from the Hill Interaction Matrix (Form G) and the Bonney Scale in rating an extended counseling group of psychiatric residents (N = 10). (Author)
Descriptors: Classification, Comparative Analysis, Conceptual Schemes, Graduate Students
Portal-Foster, Charles William George – 1966
Objectives of the study were to investigate relationships between and among qualities of emotion and types or levels of work orientation in small adult instructional group interaction; to discern relationships and/or behavior patterns which would be tested under laboratory conditions; and to test the consistency and utility of the…
Descriptors: Adult Learning, Behavior Theories, Bibliographies, Doctoral Dissertations
Park, James – 1972
The use of videotape tests is presented. Such tests enable the educator to assess student performance more directly than traditional paper and pencil tests. Test 1 was exploratory. Test 2 was designed to measure empathetic understanding. It contains 16 scenes, each about one minute long, which show five individuals in a group situation. The…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Audiovisual Aids, College Students, Educational Psychology