NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 5 results Save | Export
Eme, Robert F.; Walker, Ronald E. – J Clin Psychol, 1969
Descriptors: Group Testing, Individual Testing, Intelligence Quotient, Intelligence Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Krieshok, Thomas S.; Harrington, Robert G. – Journal of Counseling & Development, 1985
Reviews the administrative features, uses, development, standardization, reliability, and validity of the Multidimensional Aptitude Battery (MAB), a new group intelligence test designed to be a paper-and-pencil parallel to the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised (WAIS-R). (BL)
Descriptors: Group Testing, Intelligence Tests, Test Construction, Test Reliability
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Watson, Charles G.; Klett, William G. – Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1973
In a search for an adequate but efficient substitute, the authors have instituted three evaluations of the relationships between potential WAIS-substitutes and the WAIS itself. The present report describes the first of these researches-- a study of the relationships between the four group ability tests and the WAIS in a mental hospital setting.…
Descriptors: Ability Identification, Group Testing, Institutionalized Persons, Intelligence Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Nevo, Baruch; Sela, Roni – High Ability Studies, 2003
This research studied the interchangeability of individually administered and group administered cognitive tests. Seventy undergraduate students took the Hebrew version of the WAIS-R (Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised), and their IQs were measured. They also took the IPET (Israeli Psychometric Entrance Test) and their IPET scores were…
Descriptors: Undergraduate Students, Psychometrics, Intelligence Tests, Intelligence Quotient
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Storandt, Martha – Journal of Gerontology, 1977
Timed and untimed scoring methods were employed with five WAIS subtests administered to 40 young and 40 old subjects matched for verbal intelligence. Elimination of bonuses for rapid performance differentially improved the scores of older subjects but did not raise those scores to levels achieved by the young. (Author)
Descriptors: Ability Identification, Age Differences, Comparative Analysis, Gerontology