Descriptor
| Group Testing | 2 |
| Aptitude Tests | 1 |
| College Freshmen | 1 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Counselor Role | 1 |
| Individual Counseling | 1 |
| Standardized Tests | 1 |
| Test Interpretation | 1 |
| Test Reliability | 1 |
| Test Wiseness | 1 |
| Testing Problems | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Measurement and Evaluation in… | 2 |
Author
| Nevo, Barukh | 1 |
| Van Riper, B. W. | 1 |
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Van Riper, B. W. – Measurement and Evaluation in Guidance, 1974
The thesis advanced in this article is that public indignation regarding testing is largely the result of an appraisal process that has been measurement-centered rather than person-centered. As a consequence, appraisal is viewed by the public as an evaluative process rather than a helping process. Recommendations are made. (Author)
Descriptors: Counselor Role, Group Testing, Individual Counseling, Standardized Tests
Nevo, Barukh – Measurement and Evaluation in Guidance, 1976
Freshmen (N=202) took two batteries of aptitude tests 10 months apart. Six pairs of tests were studied. Two pairs were identical, two were parallel, and two were completely different. This design made it possible to separate three components of practice: (a) general test sophistication, (b) specific practice effect, and (c) item familiarization.…
Descriptors: Aptitude Tests, College Freshmen, Comparative Analysis, Group Testing
