Descriptor
| Group Structure | 3 |
| Groups | 3 |
| Interpersonal Relationship | 2 |
| Affective Behavior | 1 |
| Antisocial Behavior | 1 |
| Decision Making | 1 |
| Friendship | 1 |
| Group Dynamics | 1 |
| Group Norms | 1 |
| Nonverbal Communication | 1 |
| Personal Space | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Small Group Behavior | 3 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 3 |
| Reports - Research | 3 |
| Information Analyses | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedEdney, Julian J.; Grundmann, Michael J. – Small Group Behavior, 1979
The results suggested group space boundaries increased with group size (from groups of one to two to four) if group members were strangers, but not if group members were friends. The only nonspatial variable found to correlate with boundary size was personal identity. (Author)
Descriptors: Friendship, Group Structure, Groups, Interpersonal Relationship
Peer reviewedFarrell, Michael P. – Small Group Behavior, 1979
This study first investigates the effects of group structure on collective projections in groups, then examines how collective projections feed back and affect group structure. It examines the effects of having a deviant in a group on group projections and responses. (Author)
Descriptors: Affective Behavior, Antisocial Behavior, Group Norms, Group Structure
Peer reviewedFalk, Gideon – Small Group Behavior, 1981
Uses a laboratory experiment involving role-playing groups to show that an assigned majority rule is likely to lead to higher-quality solutions than unanimity and no-decision rule. Results indicated under majority rule workers resistance to the foreman's power often resulted in a successful search for a better solution. (JAC)
Descriptors: Decision Making, Group Dynamics, Group Structure, Groups
