NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Source
Applied Measurement in…19
Audience
Location
Canada1
Virginia1
Laws, Policies, & Programs
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 19 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Yue Liu; Zhen Li; Hongyun Liu; Xiaofeng You – Applied Measurement in Education, 2024
Low test-taking effort of examinees has been considered a source of construct-irrelevant variance in item response modeling, leading to serious consequences on parameter estimation. This study aims to investigate how non-effortful response (NER) influences the estimation of item and person parameters in item-pool scale linking (IPSL) and whether…
Descriptors: Item Response Theory, Computation, Simulation, Responses
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Rios, Joseph – Applied Measurement in Education, 2022
To mitigate the deleterious effects of rapid guessing (RG) on ability estimates, several rescoring procedures have been proposed. Underlying many of these procedures is the assumption that RG is accurately identified. At present, there have been minimal investigations examining the utility of rescoring approaches when RG is misclassified, and…
Descriptors: Accuracy, Guessing (Tests), Scoring, Classification
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Wise, Steven; Kuhfeld, Megan – Applied Measurement in Education, 2021
Effort-moderated (E-M) scoring is intended to estimate how well a disengaged test taker would have performed had they been fully engaged. It accomplishes this adjustment by excluding disengaged responses from scoring and estimating performance from the remaining responses. The scoring method, however, assumes that the remaining responses are not…
Descriptors: Scoring, Achievement Tests, Identification, Validity
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Rios, Joseph A. – Applied Measurement in Education, 2022
Testing programs are confronted with the decision of whether to report individual scores for examinees that have engaged in rapid guessing (RG). As noted by the "Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing," this decision should be based on a documented criterion that determines score exclusion. To this end, a number of heuristic…
Descriptors: Testing, Guessing (Tests), Academic Ability, Scores
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Wise, Steven L. – Applied Measurement in Education, 2020
In achievement testing there is typically a practical requirement that the set of items administered should be representative of some target content domain. This is accomplished by establishing test blueprints specifying the content constraints to be followed when selecting the items for a test. Sometimes, however, students give disengaged…
Descriptors: Test Items, Test Content, Achievement Tests, Guessing (Tests)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Wise, Steven L. – Applied Measurement in Education, 2019
The identification of rapid guessing is important to promote the validity of achievement test scores, particularly with low-stakes tests. Effective methods for identifying rapid guesses require reliable threshold methods that are also aligned with test taker behavior. Although several common threshold methods are based on rapid guessing response…
Descriptors: Guessing (Tests), Identification, Reaction Time, Reliability
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Abu-Ghazalah, Rashid M.; Dubins, David N.; Poon, Gregory M. K. – Applied Measurement in Education, 2023
Multiple choice results are inherently probabilistic outcomes, as correct responses reflect a combination of knowledge and guessing, while incorrect responses additionally reflect blunder, a confidently committed mistake. To objectively resolve knowledge from responses in an MC test structure, we evaluated probabilistic models that explicitly…
Descriptors: Guessing (Tests), Multiple Choice Tests, Probability, Models
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Wise, Steven L.; Kuhfeld, Megan R.; Soland, James – Applied Measurement in Education, 2019
When we administer educational achievement tests, we want to be confident that the resulting scores validly indicate what the test takers know and can do. However, if the test is perceived as low stakes by the test taker, disengaged test taking sometimes occurs, which poses a serious threat to score validity. When computer-based tests are used,…
Descriptors: Guessing (Tests), Computer Assisted Testing, Achievement Tests, Scores
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Abulela, Mohammed A. A.; Rios, Joseph A. – Applied Measurement in Education, 2022
When there are no personal consequences associated with test performance for examinees, rapid guessing (RG) is a concern and can differ between subgroups. To date, the impact of differential RG on item-level measurement invariance has received minimal attention. To that end, a simulation study was conducted to examine the robustness of the…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Robustness (Statistics), Nonparametric Statistics, Item Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Haladyna, Thomas M.; Rodriguez, Michael C.; Stevens, Craig – Applied Measurement in Education, 2019
The evidence is mounting regarding the guidance to employ more three-option multiple-choice items. From theoretical analyses, empirical results, and practical considerations, such items are of equal or higher quality than four- or five-option items, and more items can be administered to improve content coverage. This study looks at 58 tests,…
Descriptors: Multiple Choice Tests, Test Items, Testing Problems, Guessing (Tests)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Wise, Steven L.; Kingsbury, G. Gage – Applied Measurement in Education, 2022
In achievement testing we assume that students will demonstrate their maximum performance as they encounter test items. Sometimes, however, student performance can decline during a test event, which implies that the test score does not represent maximum performance. This study describes a method for identifying significant performance decline and…
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Performance, Classification, Guessing (Tests)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Soland, James – Applied Measurement in Education, 2018
This study estimated male-female and Black-White achievement gaps without accounting for low test motivation, then compared those estimates to ones that used several approaches to addressing rapid guessing. Researchers investigated two issues: (1) The differences in rates of rapid guessing across subgroups and (2) How much achievement gap…
Descriptors: Guessing (Tests), Achievement Gap, Student Motivation, Learner Engagement
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Guo, Hongwen; Rios, Joseph A.; Haberman, Shelby; Liu, Ou Lydia; Wang, Jing; Paek, Insu – Applied Measurement in Education, 2016
Unmotivated test takers using rapid guessing in item responses can affect validity studies and teacher and institution performance evaluation negatively, making it critical to identify these test takers. The authors propose a new nonparametric method for finding response-time thresholds for flagging item responses that result from rapid-guessing…
Descriptors: Guessing (Tests), Reaction Time, Nonparametric Statistics, Models
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Setzer, J. Carl; Wise, Steven L.; van den Heuvel, Jill R.; Ling, Guangming – Applied Measurement in Education, 2013
Assessment results collected under low-stakes testing situations are subject to effects of low examinee effort. The use of computer-based testing allows researchers to develop new ways of measuring examinee effort, particularly using response times. At the item level, responses can be classified as exhibiting either rapid-guessing behavior or…
Descriptors: Testing, Guessing (Tests), Reaction Time, Test Items
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Kong, Xiaojing; Davis, Laurie Laughlin; McBride, Yuanyuan; Morrison, Kristin – Applied Measurement in Education, 2018
Item response time data were used in investigating the differences in student test-taking behavior between two device conditions: computer and tablet. Analyses were conducted to address the questions of whether or not the device condition had a differential impact on rapid guessing and solution behaviors (with response time effort used as an…
Descriptors: Educational Technology, Technology Uses in Education, Computers, Handheld Devices
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1  |  2