ERIC Number: EJ1470364
Record Type: Journal
Publication Date: 2025-May
Pages: 34
Abstractor: As Provided
ISBN: N/A
ISSN: ISSN-1360-2357
EISSN: EISSN-1573-7608
Available Date: 2024-12-03
Mobile Learning in the Classroom -- Should Students Bring Mobile Devices for Learning, or Should These Be Provided by Schools?
Daniel Laumann1,2; Maurice Krause3; Fabienne E. Kremer4; Barbara Leibrock5; Malte S. Ubben1; Boris Forthmann6; Robin Janzik7; Dörthe Masemann5; Felix Reer7; Cornelia Denz5,8; Gilbert Greefrath3; Susanne Heinicke1; Annette Marohn4; Thorsten Quandt7; Elmar Souvignier6; Stefan Heusler1
Education and Information Technologies, v30 n7 p9463-9496 2025
In recent years, the importance of mobile devices has increased for education in general and more specifically for science and mathematics education. In the classroom, approaches for teaching with mobile devices include using student-owned devices ("bring your own device"; BYOD approach) or using school-owned devices from central pools (POOL approach). While many studies point out features of mobile learning and BYOD that are conducive to learning, a research gap can be identified in the analysis of effects of mobile device access concepts on teaching-learning processes. Thus, this study aimed to empirically compare BYOD and POOL approaches in terms of learning performance and cognitive performance (subject knowledge development, cognitive load, concentration performance). Furthermore, the analyses included specific characteristics and preconditions (gender, socioeconomic status, fear of missing out, problematic smartphone use). A quasi-experimental study (two groups) was conducted in year 8 and 9 physics classes (N = 339 students) in which smartphones are used for different purposes. The present data show no group differences between the BYOD and the POOL approach in the group of learners with respect to subject knowledge development, cognitive load, and concentration performance. However, individual findings in subsamples indicate that the POOL approach may be beneficial for certain learners (e.g., learners with low fear of missing out or learners tending toward problematic smartphone use). For school practice, these results indicate that organizational, economic, and ecological aspects appear to be the main factors in deciding about the mobile device access concept.
Descriptors: Electronic Learning, Technology Uses in Education, Educational Technology, Handheld Devices, Ownership, Telecommunications, Computer Assisted Instruction, Instructional Effectiveness, Cognitive Processes, Difficulty Level, Attention Control, Science Education, Physics
Springer. Available from: Springer Nature. One New York Plaza, Suite 4600, New York, NY 10004. Tel: 800-777-4643; Tel: 212-460-1500; Fax: 212-460-1700; e-mail: customerservice@springernature.com; Web site: https://link.springer.com/
Publication Type: Journal Articles; Reports - Research
Education Level: N/A
Audience: N/A
Language: English
Sponsor: N/A
Authoring Institution: N/A
Grant or Contract Numbers: N/A
Author Affiliations: 1University of Münster, Faculty of Physics, Institute of Physics Education, Münster, Germany; 2University of Mu¨nster, Faculty of Physics, Institute of Physics, Mu¨nster, Germany; 3University of Mu¨nster, Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science, Institute of Mathematics Education and Computer Science Education, Mu¨nster, Germany; 4University of Mu¨nster, Faculty of Chemistry and Pharmacy, Institute of Chemistry Education, Mu¨nster, Germany; 5University of Mu¨nster, Faculty of Physics, Institute of Applied Physics, Mu¨nster, Germany; 6University of Mu¨nster, Faculty of Psychology/Sport and Exercise Sciences, Institute for Psychology in Education and Instruction, Mu¨nster, Germany; 7University of Mu¨nster, Faculty of Educational and Social Sciences, Department of Communication, Mu¨nster, Germany; 8Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt, The National Institute of Metrology, Braunschweig, Germany